Calculating force of water coming out

  • Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Force Water
In summary, the side wall of a wide vertical cylindrical vessel of height 75 cm has a narrow vertical slit running all the way to the bottom of the vessel. The length of slit is 50 cm and width b = 0.1 cm. With the slit closed, the vessel is filled with water. Immediately after the slit is opened, the resultant force of reaction of the water flowing out of the vessel is 4.9 N.
  • #1
Raghav Gupta
1,011
76

Homework Statement


The side wall of a wide vertical cylindrical vessel of height , h = 75 cm has a narrow vertical slit running all the way to the bottom of the vessel. The length of slit is l = 50 cm and width b = 0.1 cm. With the slit closed, the vessel is filled with water. What is the resultant force of reaction of the water flowing out of the vessel immediately after the slit is opened?
Snapshot2.jpg


A. 4.9 N
B. 0.49 N
C. 49 N
D. 490 N

Homework Equations


P = P0 + ρgh
F = PA
g = 9.8 m/s2
ρ = 103kg/m3
b = 10-3m
h = 3/4 m
l = 1/2 m

The Attempt at a Solution


Snapshot3.jpg

The P0 will be canceled as outside pressure is also P0
$$ F = \int_0^l bρg(h-l)dl $$

## F = bρg [hl - \frac{l^2}{2} ] ##

⇒ F= 9.8 /4 = 2.45 N

Where is the flaw?
Why I am getting a wrong answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I get the same answer. Do you know what it is supposed to be?
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
I get the same answer. Do you know what it is supposed to be?
Yes, it is supposed to be 4.9 N.
They have given solution showing Toricelli law.
Is this approach wrong?
 
  • #4
Raghav Gupta said:
Yes, it is supposed to be 4.9 N.
They have given solution showing Toricelli law.
Is this approach wrong?
Can you post the whole supposed solution?
 
  • #5
But... it clearly says "immediately after the slit is opened". It will take time to reach a steady velocity, so I do not see how Torricelli's law can be applied here.
 
  • #6
haruspex said:
But... it clearly says "immediately after the slit is opened". It will take time to reach a steady velocity, so I do not see how Torricelli's law can be applied here.
So if they would not have written "immediately" would then my answer have been wrong and their's correct?
 
  • #7
They added the word immediately to let you know that you are to use the starting level of fluid in the tank to calculate the velocity out of the slot. As far as the time required to establish a steady velocity distribution is concerned, they intended you to assume that this happens instantaneously, and can be neglected. The time required would be on the order of the depth divided by the speed of sound. The level in the tank would not change significantly during that time interval.

What they are doing here is a horizontal momentum balance on the fluid. They are finding the force that the tank has to exert on the fluid to accelerate it out of the slot at the indicated velocity. This is equal and opposite to the horizontal force that the fluid exerts on the tank.

Their analysis is correct.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #8
Chestermiller said:
They added the word immediately to let you know that you are to use the starting level of fluid in the tank to calculate the velocity out of the slot. As far as the time required to establish a steady velocity distribution is concerned, they intended you to assume that this happens instantaneously, and can be neglected. The time required would be on the order of the depth divided by the speed of sound. The level in the tank would not change significantly during that time interval.

What they are doing here is a horizontal momentum balance on the fluid. They are finding the force that the tank has to exert on the fluid to accelerate it out of the slot at the indicated velocity. This is equal and opposite to the horizontal force that the fluid exerts on the tank.

Their analysis is correct.

Chet
Chet, can you explain what is wrong with the analysis adopted by both Raghav and me? Prior to removal of the strip, the water exerted a force on the strip of 2.45N. The instant the strip is removed, that force is no longer exerted, but all the other forces on the container remain. So the reaction force should be 2.45N.
To make the Torricelli solution correct, it should have asked for the force when the flow is established but the level has barely fallen.
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta and Chestermiller
  • #9
haruspex said:
Chet, can you explain what is wrong with the analysis adopted by both Raghav and me? Prior to removal of the strip, the water exerted a force on the strip of 2.45N. The instant the strip is removed, that force is no longer exerted, but all the other forces on the container remain. So the reaction force should be 2.45N.
To make the Torricelli solution correct, it should have asked for the force when the flow is established but the level has barely fallen.
I agree. The problem is poorly posed.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta
  • #10
Thanks guys.
I posted this problem since I was amazed that why my attempt was giving a solution not in options and I tried and tried but still same 2.45 N, but I see the solution which they have given is interpreting something else.
 
  • #11
Let us consider an infinetisimal portion of length [itex]dx[/itex] of the slit at a depth [itex]x[/itex] below water level.
Reaction force due to this portion is given by:
[itex]dF = a(v^2)p = bdx(2gx)p[/itex]
Total reaction force is Integration of this expression from:
[itex](h-l)→ (h)[/itex].
Here [itex]b [/itex] is the Breadth, [itex]p [/itex] is the Density, [itex]a [/itex] is the Area.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #12
Parthc said:
Let us consider an infinetisimal portion of length [itex]dx[/itex] of the slit at a depth [itex]x[/itex] below water level.
Reaction force due to this portion is given by:
[itex]dF = a(v^2)p = bdx(2gx)p[/itex]
Total reaction force is Integration of this expression from:
[itex](h-l)→ (h)[/itex].
Here [itex]b [/itex] is the Breadth, [itex]p [/itex] is the Density, [itex]a [/itex] is the Area.
Did you realize that this thread is over 3 1/2 years old and that the OP has not been seen since early July?
 

Related to Calculating force of water coming out

1. How is the force of water coming out calculated?

The force of water coming out can be calculated using the equation F = m x v, where F is the force, m is the mass of the water, and v is the velocity of the water.

2. What factors affect the force of water coming out?

The force of water coming out can be affected by the mass of the water, the velocity of the water, and the surface area of the opening through which the water is coming out.

3. Can the force of water coming out be increased?

Yes, the force of water coming out can be increased by increasing the mass or velocity of the water, or by decreasing the surface area of the opening, which will concentrate the force on a smaller area.

4. How is the velocity of water coming out measured?

The velocity of water coming out can be measured using a flow meter, which uses different methods such as ultrasonic or electromagnetic sensors to calculate the velocity of the water.

5. What are some real-life applications of calculating the force of water coming out?

Calculating the force of water coming out is important in many fields such as engineering, hydrology, and environmental science. It is used to design and analyze water systems, such as dams and pipelines, and to understand the impact of water flow on natural systems, such as rivers and oceans.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
773
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Back
Top