Can Farnsworth Fusors create fusion energy like the sun?

In summary: However, if someone were to create a smaller version of the sun, following the same concept as the C-N-O cycle, they could theoretically solve the issue of electricity.
  • #1
keigh
3
0
questiion guys..

why nuclear power uses diff kind of elements such as plutonium?
while sun has only two elements two produce energy.

i ask that question because i am curious on how energy is created trough atom fusion.
while studying the basic principle of chemical reaction of the SUN, the two main elements that created a huge amount of energy is hydrogen and helium.

my conclusion is maybe i can create an energy if i do the same as the sun's chemical reaction.
do you think this could be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
keigh said:
questiion guys..

why nuclear power uses diff kind of elements such as plutonium?
while sun has only two elements two produce energy.

i ask that question because i am curious on how energy is created trough atom fusion.
while studying the basic principle of chemical reaction of the SUN, the two main elements that created a huge amount of energy is hydrogen and helium.

my conclusion is maybe i can create an energy if i do the same as the sun's chemical reaction.
do you think this could be possible?
Fissile isotopes such as U-233, U-235 and Pu-239 release energy (~205 MeV/fission) upon fissioning in response to neutron absorption.

The sun and most other stars produce energy via fusion, a process in which lighter elements, primarily hydrogen in the form of protons, combine into heavier elements.

The sun does not produce energy by chemical reactions. The sun is sustained by fusion by virture of the proton-proton cycle, and a little by fusion of protons in the C-N-O cycle.
 
  • #3
Astronuc said:
The sun does not produce energy by chemical reactions. The sun is sustained by fusion by virture of the proton-proton cycle, and a little by fusion of protons in the C-N-O cycle.

And this happens in the sun because of the huge pressures in its interior caused by gravity.

There is certainly plenty of research going on into fusion power, but it's very difficult (much more difficult than making an unstable nucleus split) and it remains to be seen if it can be made practical.
 
  • #4
what if we do make a smaller version of sun?
i mean if we follow the concept of C-N-O cycle of the sun then we can solve the problem of electricity. because here in our country a few days a go a black out was occured.
with my simple idea it will change everything.
actually I've done my first step, by water splitting I've separated hydrogen atom and oxygen. my problem is how to contain the hydrohen atom.

i've also created my own procedures and collected some materials.

coz i would like to do some experiments.
 
  • #5
Physicists and engineers have been trying for decades to duplicate the energy production method of the sun in a sustained reaction, so far without success. It is most certainly not a trivial undertaking and there isn't anything you can do on your own that will come anywhere close to it.
 
  • #6
thank you very much for those who offered their knowledge.
how ever, i have to continue this and think a possible solution on how to do this idea.
no one knows.. maybe if i already reach my limitation and my ideas are not working then that would be the time to stop.

tahnk you very much.
 
  • #7
keigh said:
what if we do make a smaller version of sun?
i mean if we follow the concept of C-N-O cycle of the sun then we can solve the problem of electricity. because here in our country a few days a go a black out was occured.
with my simple idea it will change everything.
actually I've done my first step, by water splitting I've separated hydrogen atom and oxygen. my problem is how to contain the hydrohen atom.

i've also created my own procedures and collected some materials.

coz i would like to do some experiments.
As the_house indicated, the conditions within the sun produce high pressures, well beyond the capability of any man-made engineered material. We simply cannot replicated the conditions within the sun in order to sustain a fusion reaction.

As Russ indicated, we've been trying to perfect fusion for energy production for several decades now. We don't do proton fusion, but fusion of other hydrogen isotopes, deuterons and tritons, and sometime deuterons with Li nuclei. We can make thermonuclear weapons, but that is not controlled, nor is it practical for energy production.

An ideal fusion system would produce no neutrons. Beside d + Li6, fusion of p + B11 would be ideal. However, these reactions require high temperatures, and in conjunction with reasonable high nuclear densities, pressure is a problem. The yields are too low to practical with current systems.
 
  • #8
russ_watters said:
Physicists and engineers have been trying for decades to duplicate the energy production method of the sun in a sustained reaction, so far without success. It is most certainly not a trivial undertaking and there isn't anything you can do on your own that will come anywhere close to it.

Producing fusion in the home lab is actually quite easy if one uses a Farnsworth fusor-type device. I've seen it done myself several times, high-school kids are doing it. A friend of mine, Doug Coulter, see: http://www.coultersmithing.com/ has a fusion reactor in his lab.

The problem with these types of fusion reactors is the efficiencies are very low. If you put 1000 watts of power into the reactor, at best, you get about 1000.0000001 watts of power out, most of the input power is turned into heat. The actual power from fusion is measured in microwatts or less.

As Russ points out, this isn't "anywhere close" to what is being done in the sun. In a fusor, the fusion ions (deuterium) are accelerated towards each other using a high-voltage (usually 30kV to 50kV or higher) electric field. Some of the ions hit each other with sufficient energy to cause a fusion reaction.

In the sun, the energy is supplied using heat generated by the pressure of the gravity of the elements in the sun itself. This type of fusion (fusion through heat and pressure) has only been created in very expensive labs with extensive government funding.

So if you want to duplicate what's being done in the sun, you're best bet is to get a Ph.D and join a big government lab. If you want to experiment with fusion, I suggest looking into electrostatic fusion and Farnsworth Fusors in particular.
 

1. What is nuclear power and plutonium?

Nuclear power is a form of energy that is generated through the use of nuclear reactions, specifically the splitting of atoms (nuclear fission). Plutonium is a radioactive element that is often used as a fuel in nuclear reactors.

2. How is nuclear power generated?

Nuclear power is generated through the process of nuclear fission, where atoms of uranium or plutonium are split in a controlled reaction. This reaction produces heat, which is then converted into electricity through a steam turbine.

3. What are the advantages of nuclear power?

Nuclear power is a reliable and efficient source of energy that does not produce greenhouse gas emissions. It also has a high energy density, meaning that it can produce large amounts of electricity with relatively small amounts of fuel. Additionally, nuclear power plants can operate for long periods of time without needing to refuel.

4. What are the risks associated with nuclear power?

The main risk associated with nuclear power is the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns or radioactive leaks, which can have serious environmental and health consequences. There is also the issue of nuclear waste disposal, as the spent fuel from nuclear reactors remains radioactive and hazardous for thousands of years.

5. How is plutonium used in nuclear power?

Plutonium is used as a fuel in nuclear reactors, where it undergoes fission to produce heat. It is also used in the production of nuclear weapons. The process of creating plutonium, called reprocessing, is highly complex and poses additional risks and challenges for nuclear power plants.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
516
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top