Can this be another reason for dark energy?

In summary, the initial force and energy of the big bang caused the matter to be close together, resulting in strong gravitational attraction. However, as time passed, the distance between cosmological objects increased due to the initial acceleration of the big bang, causing a decrease in gravity. As gravity is the main force between objects moving apart at a constant velocity, this decrease in gravity would result in an observer noticing an acceleration of the objects moving apart. This is what is observed in the universe today. However, dark energy, which was first noticed due to the increasing acceleration rate, is not the initial force of the big bang. It is an additional energy that has come into existence after the initial big bang and is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe
  • #1
Inderjeet Singh
Suppose the initial force and energy bursting out during big bang was very huge . The matter just after big bang would have been very close , so the gravitational attraction would have been very high , which would have caused the acceleration produced by big bang to decrease . As time increased , gravity between cosmological objects decreased ( due to increase of distance caused by initial acceleration of big bang ) . As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart . That is what we know today ! . I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?

Ps – Sorry for my bad explanation skill :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Inderjeet Singh said:
I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?
No it is not. There would be NO acceleration due to the force of the BB (I mean, think about it) which is why, when the acceleration was first noticed (and attributed to the mysterious "dark energy") everyone was quite surprised.

Also, you might find it instructional to stop and think about whether you have come up with an idea that has eluded THOUSANDS of serious professional physicists.
 
  • #3
Inderjeet Singh said:
Suppose the initial force and energy bursting out during big bang was very huge . The matter just after big bang would have been very close , so the gravitational attraction would have been very high , which would have caused the acceleration produced by big bang to decrease . As time increased , gravity between cosmological objects decreased ( due to increase of distance caused by initial acceleration of big bang ) . As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart . That is what we know today ! . I just want to ask if dark energy is nothing but the initial force of big bang which seems to accelerate due to decrease of gravity ?

Ps – Sorry for my bad explanation skill :)
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Please keep in mind that we do not discuss personal theories here on the PF. It is fine to phrase it in the form of a question, but proposing new mechanisms for observed phenomena is not allowed. Thanks.
 
  • #4
Your hypothesis would not result in accelerating expansion,
It would result in an expansion rate that gradually decreases over time, and could possibly reverse in the future.
Prior to the 1990's this is what many astronomers expected they would observe when a new generation of more powerful telescopes went into service.
Instead the observations indicated that the acceleration rate actually is increasing over time.
That implies additional energy coming into existence after the initial big bang, and that's what got the name dark energy.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Inderjeet Singh said:
As gravity is the only major force between objects getting apart at a constant velocity , and it is decreasing , then an observer would notice that the objects are accelerating apart .
You mean expanding with a decreasing rate.
That would be the case if there was no dark energy. Then, the accelerating rate (or better said "expansion rate") would be decreasing.
rootone said:
Instead the observations indicated that the acceleration rate actually is increasing over time.
rootone said:
That implies additional energy coming into existence after the initial big bang, and that's what got the name dark energy.
Exactly!
Thus we just happen to live in that time era and age of the universe (i.e. ≅ 13.8 billion years after the big bang) where dark energy prevails over gravity and that's why we observe accelerating expansion of the universe. (That effect had already started roughly 5 billion years ago, or approximayelly 8.8 billion years after the big bang ...)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_expansion_of_the_universe

Note: current "precise" measurement of the age of the universe is (13.799 ± 0.021) billion (i.e. 109) years.
( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe )
 

1. What is dark energy?

Dark energy is a theoretical form of energy that is thought to be responsible for the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe. It is believed to make up about 70% of the total energy in the universe.

2. What is the current leading explanation for dark energy?

The leading explanation for dark energy is the cosmological constant, which was first proposed by Albert Einstein. This theory suggests that empty space has a constant energy density that exerts a repulsive force, causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate.

3. Can there be other reasons for dark energy besides the cosmological constant?

Yes, there are several competing theories that attempt to explain dark energy. Some propose that dark energy is a property of space itself, while others suggest that it could be a new type of fundamental particle or field. However, the cosmological constant remains the most widely accepted explanation.

4. How can we detect or measure dark energy?

Dark energy is extremely difficult to detect directly, as it does not interact with light or other forms of matter. Instead, scientists rely on indirect measurements, such as observing the effects of dark energy on the expansion of the universe or studying the large-scale structure of the cosmos.

5. Could there be multiple factors contributing to dark energy?

Some theories propose that dark energy may be the result of multiple factors, such as a combination of the cosmological constant and other unknown forms of energy. However, more research and observational evidence is needed to fully understand the nature of dark energy and its possible sources.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
554
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
787
  • Cosmology
Replies
0
Views
374
Back
Top