- #1
- 3,149
- 8
Homework Statement
Let R have the topology consisting of all the sets A such that R\A is either countable or all of R. Is [0, 1] a compact subspace in this topology?
The Attempt at a Solution
If U covers R, if it consists of sets of type A such that R\A is finite, then [0, 1] is compact, since, if we take any set A from U, and if A doesn't cover [0, 1], then there's a finite number of points missing to cover [0, 1], let's say x1, ..., xn, and for each xi we can take a set Ai from U containing xi until we cover [0, 1], so we have a finite subcover (consisting of n+1 sets of U).
The interesting case is where R\A is countably infinite.
Let U be a cover for [0, 1] consisting of the following sets:
U1 = R\{1/n : n is a positive integer}
U2 = R\{1/(n+1) : n is a positive integer}
U3 = R\{1/(n+2) : n is a positive integer}, etc.
The family U covers [0, 1], right? But it doesn't have a finite subcover. Does this work?
Edit: by the way, Munkres says:
Definition. If Y is a subspace of X, a collection A of subsets of X is said to cover Y if the union of its elements contains Y.
Lemma 26.1. Let Y be a subspace of X, Then Y is compact if and only if every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcollection covering Y.
So I considered sets open in R, in the given topology. I hope there's no "subspace issue" I ignored here unwillingly.