Deciding between Physics or Engineering

In summary: You will not have to do as much research as a physicist to get a job, and you will be more likely to find a job in your area of expertise. There are many jobs out there for engineers, but the market for engineers is always changing. Engineers usually have a lot of training and experience in their field, and so it is not as difficult to transition from one job to another. Overall, it is harder to get a job as a physicist than it is to get a job as an engineer, but the jobs that are available are generally better paid and more fulfilling.
  • #1
smartdude00111
7
0
I'm trying to decide if I should pursue a career in physics in physics or engineering. I'm 17 and will be applying to universities soon and I'm considering the University of Waterloo, Queen's University and University of Toronto. If I continue with engineering than I would most likely pursue mechanical or mechatronics.

I really have a passion for particle physics and astrophysics and am wishing to achieve a masters and PhD but I'm aware that there seems to be limited job market for these professions. I've done some research and there are a lot of different answers as to how hard it is to find a job, some say it is relatively easy but others say that the market for these jobs will only diminish.I do not plan on having a large family and so money is not such a big concern but I would like a living wage, such as 65,000k. I would like to know how difficult it is and how long it takes to find a stable position in a pure field of physics. Also are the job prospects any different between theoretical and experimental physics.

It seems like there are greater job opportunities for mechanical or mechatronical engineers, so if I pursue an education in one of these fields than it would be for the job security, I would enjoy a career in these fields and so I would not be miserable but I feel like I would enjoy physics more.

I've also considered doing a double major, or minoring in physics, but I understand that this would entail a lot of work and am not completely sure about how that would work.

I'm just looking for some statistics and advice because I'll be applying to programs shortly and am a little stressed. It's a big decision and any input will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You could also consider to make a BA in engineering to learn how engineers think and then a master in physics to learn how to think :-)
Seriously speaking, I hardly know of any theoretical physicist working as such after his PhD, even less in particle physics.
When talking about family take in mind that these decisions depend also largely on your partner which you may not have found yet.
On the other hand time at university will probably be the only time in your live until retirement when you will be free to pursue your own interests.
 
  • #3
DrDu said:
You could also consider to make a BA in engineering to learn how engineers think and then a master in physics to learn how to think :-)

I would certainly agree that there is a difference, but it is not the difference that this comment implies.

As to which degree you should pursue, I think much depends on how good you expect to be at what you do. If you are willing to work hard enough to be at the top of whatever you choose, you will find employment there. If, on the other hand, you do not envision working that hard and want to be more assured of a job, you need to look hard at where the jobs are more abundant.
 
  • #4
In making this decision it's important to remember that what you're deciding on is the direction of your post--secondary education and not necessarily your career (although the two are often correlated).

Physics is an academic degree. In general a physics degree is oriented towards preparing students for graduate studies in physics. The majority of people who study physics do not go on to become professors, unfortunately. It's hard to give precise statistics on those who do. If you finish a PhD in astrophysics or particle physics, it's best to assume you've got about a 1 in 10 chance of getting a tenured position and that you'll be competing against many highly motivated, extremely intelligent and hard-working people for it. That said, the data indicates that physics graduates tend to do quite well in terms of salaries and job satisfaction when they do enter the workforce, and there is low unemployment associated with the degree. One of the bigger issues is that they aren't usually doing the physics research that they wanted to do originally. The other is that the transition from academia to the workforce can be difficult. A lot can depend on the skills that you pick up during your education.

Engineering on the other hand is a professional degree. Most engineering programs are set up specifically to allow you to enter the workforce as an engineer.
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney and StatGuy2000

What is the difference between physics and engineering?

Physics is a natural science that focuses on understanding the fundamental laws and principles that govern the behavior of matter and energy in the universe. Engineering, on the other hand, is the application of scientific and mathematical principles to design and create practical solutions for real-world problems.

Which field offers better job opportunities?

Both physics and engineering have a wide range of job opportunities in various industries. However, engineering tends to have more specific and practical applications, making it a more marketable degree in industries such as technology, construction, and manufacturing.

Which field requires more math?

Both physics and engineering require a strong background in mathematics. However, engineering typically involves more practical applications of math, such as calculus and statistics, while physics focuses more on theoretical and mathematical concepts.

Do physics and engineering have similar coursework?

There is some overlap in coursework between physics and engineering, particularly in fields such as mechanics and thermodynamics. However, engineering programs tend to have a more practical and applied focus, while physics programs focus more on theoretical concepts.

Which field is better for someone interested in research?

Both physics and engineering offer opportunities for research, but the focus and approach may differ. Physics research tends to be more theoretical and focused on understanding fundamental laws and principles, while engineering research is often more applied and focused on solving practical problems.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
94
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
446
Replies
3
Views
121
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
184
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
426
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
918
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top