Deriving the load point on equipment base

In summary, the problem is to derive a formula or equations to find the load that each of the four supports will hold on a rectangular equipment base with a center of gravity. The only unknown is the load for each support, and the current method is a long process and not suitable for an excel setting. Roark's 'Stress and Strain' is recommended as a resource for solving this problem, as it involves statically indeterminate reactions. The solution is not straightforward and might involve uplift on the far corners. The solution for a uniform load at the center of gravity is evenly distributed, but if the center of gravity moves, the weight distribution will shift. There is a solution in Roark's book, which can be a good investment,
  • #1
Isimanica
15
0

Homework Statement



Problem is this. I am tasked with deriving a formula or equations that I can then input into an excel format. I am to take an equipment base that has four sides with supports at each of the four corners. I am to find the load that each one will hold base upon the Center of Gravity of the equipment upon the base plate. You will be given the Mass, the length and width of the equipment, the location of center of gravity on the base plate. Also not worried about the weight of the base plate just about the mass with respect to the center of gravity. The only unknown is the Load that each support will hold. What he wants is to be able to type in the knowns and find each supports load weight individually. I have tried for a couple of days to figure this out but I just can't seem to figure it out. It supposed to be simple but I just don't know. Any help would be welcomed.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried using the Ideas behind Noncoplanar Parallel Force Systems but I think because the points line up those ideas and examples have not been of great help, only confuse me further.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If I understand your problem correctly, this is not a simple problem; for a plate supported on 4 corners, its reactions are statically indeterminate. If the cg of the equipment was located at the geometric center of a square base plate, the equipment load would distribute equally to the 4 corner supports; otherwise, the problem is difficult to solve, and I wouldn't be able to do it without a copy of Roark's 'Stress and Strain'.
 
  • #3
Currently they use a formula of taking the ratio between the length or width (dependent upon the side used) of where the Center of Gravity is located at. This ratio is what is used to then find the two components that make up the corner and determine the weight that is distributed. This of course is a long process and to do by hand and can't be set up well with in an excel setting. I will try and get a scan of what the idea is tonight or tomorrow.
 
  • #4
Maybe this will be more helpful

Problem

You have a wood table with length of 3 meters and width of 2 meters. Ignoring the weight of the table, a 10 Kg weight is place at the exact center of the table.
a) How much of the 10 Kg weight is each leg holding?





If the weight was moved 1.5 meter length wise from the center and 1 meter width wise from the center.
How much of the 10 Kg weight is each leg now holding.
 
  • #5
For part (a), there is no reason to not believe (and every reason to believe) that the 10 kg weight will distribute evenly to each of the four corners (25N each, using g=10m/s^2). This is due to the symmetry of the load with respect to the supports.
For part (b), I wouldn't venture a guess. I never could afford a copy of Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, so I don't have one handy. As I recall in my distant memory, even Roark might have been a little weak on this particular problem, because most of its solutions involved some sort of uniform loading over continuously supported edges, either fixed or free to rotate on those edges. The point load on a 4-corner supported plate problem is a doozy. Might even be uplift on the far corners. IMHO.
 
  • #6
PhanthomJay said:
For part (a), there is no reason to not believe (and every reason to believe) that the 10 kg weight will distribute evenly to each of the four corners (25N each, using g=10m/s^2). This is due to the symmetry of the load with respect to the supports.
For part (b), I wouldn't venture a guess. I never could afford a copy of Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, so I don't have one handy. As I recall in my distant memory, even Roark might have been a little weak on this particular problem, because most of its solutions involved some sort of uniform loading over continuously supported edges, either fixed or free to rotate on those edges. The point load on a 4-corner supported plate problem is a doozy. Might even be uplift on the far corners. IMHO.

See this is what driving me batty. I know that uniform load would distribute evenly if it is at the center of gravity. Knowing that also should the center of gravity move then the weight distribution will shift. But some where there must be a formula that gives you a way to know with some certainty what each leg or point will hold. I mean equipment manufactures must know something before just weighing each point on the equipment.
So now hearing from two people the same response of Roark's I broke down and chipped in with my dad to pick up a 7th edition of that book. I hope to find something in there that would help me out. Though I am definitely asking one of my professors at UH this question. My father and uncle spent 4 hours on a saturday trying to figure this thing out.
 
  • #7
That will be a good investment for sure. There is a solution. Please let me know if they have the example for plate stresses and support reactions for a rectangular flat plate supported at 4 corner points and loaded by a point concentrated load (not at the cg). Note that for determining the support reactions (but not the plate stresses), a distributed load may be replaced by an equivalent concentrated point load applied at the cg of the distributed load. Thanks.
 

1. What is the purpose of deriving the load point on equipment base?

Deriving the load point on equipment base is important for several reasons. It helps determine the maximum weight that can be placed on the equipment base without causing damage or instability. It also ensures proper weight distribution to prevent overloading and potential safety hazards.

2. How is the load point on equipment base calculated?

The load point on equipment base is calculated by taking into account the weight of the equipment, the dimensions of the base, and the distribution of weight on the base. This can be done using mathematical formulas or specialized software. It is important to follow industry standards and guidelines when calculating the load point.

3. What factors can affect the load point on equipment base?

Several factors can affect the load point on equipment base, including the type of equipment being placed on the base, the surface on which the base is located, and any additional weight that may be added to the base. Environmental factors such as wind and seismic activity should also be considered.

4. How do I ensure the load point on equipment base is accurate?

To ensure the accuracy of the load point on equipment base, it is important to carefully measure and calculate all relevant factors. This may involve consulting with engineering or construction professionals, as well as following industry standards and guidelines. Regular inspections and maintenance can also help ensure the accuracy of the load point over time.

5. What are the consequences of not properly deriving the load point on equipment base?

Failing to properly derive the load point on equipment base can have serious consequences, including damage or failure of the equipment, safety hazards for workers, and potential legal liabilities. It can also result in costly repairs or replacements, as well as downtime for operations. Therefore, it is important to take the time to accurately determine the load point to prevent these potential issues.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
976
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
869
Replies
38
Views
3K
Back
Top