Difference between s-matrix and interactive field propagator?

In summary: Therefore, the scattering matrix and Green's function serve different purposes in quantum field theory.
  • #1
its_blitz!
2
0
In an interactive field theory we can compute the amplitude of a particle propagating from y to x by evaluating perturbatively expressions of the form <GS|o(x)o(y)|GS> where GS stands for ground state and o are the field operators. This can be extended to higher number of operators for more particles.

My question is since we can already create states and compute amplitudes for arriving at other states in the interaction theory using the above method for evaluating green's functions, what is the need for defining in and out states and relating them via a scattering matrix that time evolves the in state? Isn't the green's function where the time y0 tends to -infinity and x0 tends to +infinity already giving you the necessary amplitude for an in state to arrive at an out state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The scattering matrix is important when we are dealing with quantum field theory. It allows us to relate the in and out states which are defined in terms of creation and annihilation operators that act on the vacuum state. The scattering matrix is used to calculate the transition probabilities of a particle going from an initial state to a final state. This is used to describe the behavior of particles over time. In contrast, the Green's function is used to describe the dynamics of a single particle propagating in spacetime. It can be used to calculate the probability amplitude of a particle going from one point in space to another. It is not used to describe the evolution of systems of particles over time.
 
  • #3


The main difference between the S-matrix and interactive field propagator lies in their respective approaches to calculating amplitudes for particle interactions. The interactive field propagator, as described in the content, uses perturbative expressions to compute the amplitude of a particle propagating from one point to another. This method is based on the use of field operators and can be extended to higher numbers of operators for more particles.

On the other hand, the S-matrix approach involves defining in and out states and using a scattering matrix to time evolve the in state to the out state. This method takes into account the entire interaction process, rather than just the propagation of a single particle. It also allows for the calculation of scattering amplitudes for multiple particles, including the possibility of particles being created or annihilated during the interaction.

In summary, while the interactive field propagator is useful for calculating the propagation of individual particles, the S-matrix approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of the overall interaction process and allows for the calculation of scattering amplitudes involving multiple particles. Both methods have their own advantages and are used in different contexts within theoretical physics.
 

Related to Difference between s-matrix and interactive field propagator?

1. What is the difference between an s-matrix and an interactive field propagator?

The s-matrix, or scattering matrix, is a mathematical object used in quantum mechanics to describe the probability of a particle scattering off another particle. It is an operator that relates the initial state of a system to its final state. On the other hand, the interactive field propagator is a mathematical tool used to calculate the probability amplitude of a particle moving from one point to another in a quantum field theory. It takes into account the interactions between particles and is used to calculate the effects of perturbations in the field.

2. How do the s-matrix and interactive field propagator relate to each other?

The s-matrix and interactive field propagator are closely related, but they serve different purposes. The s-matrix is used to calculate the probabilities of scattering events, while the interactive field propagator is used to calculate the probability amplitudes of particle propagation. In some cases, the s-matrix can be derived from the interactive field propagator, but in general they are two distinct mathematical objects.

3. Can the s-matrix and interactive field propagator be used interchangeably?

No, the s-matrix and interactive field propagator cannot be used interchangeably. They have different mathematical formulations and serve different purposes. While the s-matrix is used to calculate probabilities of scattering events, the interactive field propagator is used to calculate the probability amplitudes of particle propagation. It is important to use the appropriate tool for the specific calculation required.

4. What are the advantages of using an interactive field propagator over an s-matrix?

The interactive field propagator takes into account the interactions between particles, which allows for a more accurate calculation of particle propagation. This is especially important in quantum field theories, where interactions between particles are significant. The s-matrix, on the other hand, does not take into account interactions and is more limited in its applications.

5. Are there any limitations to using an interactive field propagator?

While the interactive field propagator is a powerful tool in quantum field theory, it does have its limitations. It is often difficult to calculate and can only be applied to certain systems with well-defined interactions. Additionally, the calculations can become very complex and may require advanced mathematical techniques. In these cases, the s-matrix may be a more practical approach.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
278
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
708
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
947
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
822
Replies
134
Views
7K
Back
Top