- #1
wunderkind
- 12
- 0
Is it possible to generate energy from chemicals in a way that would be economical, and safer compared to nuclear energy, such as the removal of electrons, etc?
new method of generating electric power by harnessing the natural electrokinetic properties of a liquid, such as ordinary tap water, when it is pumped through tiny microchannels
Chemicalsuperfreak said:H2 + O2 --> H2O
But the safety and economics of it is still in the early development stage.
ShawnD said:That won't work. The electrolysis takes more energy than the combustion (or fuel cell) gives off.
Some of the main alternatives to nuclear energy include renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power. Other alternatives include fossil fuels, such as coal and natural gas, and biofuels.
Energy can be generated from chemicals through a process called chemical reaction or combustion. This involves breaking down the chemical bonds of a substance and releasing energy in the form of heat, which can then be used to power turbines and generate electricity.
One advantage is that chemical energy can be produced using a variety of sources, whereas nuclear energy relies on a limited resource of uranium. Additionally, chemical energy does not produce radioactive waste like nuclear energy does.
Some disadvantages of using chemical energy include air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, depending on the type of fuel used. There is also a risk of accidental explosions or fires when handling certain chemicals.
Relying solely on chemical energy would not be feasible as it would require a significant amount of resources and may not be sustainable in the long term. However, incorporating it as one part of a diverse energy portfolio can help reduce our dependence on nuclear energy and other non-renewable sources.