Exploring Nonpolar Liquids: Harmful Effects & More

In summary, nonpolar liquids are substances that do not have a separation of positive and negative charges, making them less reactive than polar liquids. However, they can still have harmful effects on the environment and human health, such as pollution and toxicity. Nonpolar liquids also have unique properties, such as their ability to repel water and mix with other nonpolar substances. Studying these liquids can provide insights into their potential uses in various industrial and scientific applications.
  • #1
bomba923
763
0
1) Nonpolar liquids are dangerous? How? What are some harmful nonpolar substances--how is nonpolarity harmful? I mean, why exactly?

2) Is it true that pure distilled water is harmful to drink? I mean pure, without impurities--just pure H2O; it seems safe, but is it really harmful? What will happen if I drink it?

3) Are 1.0M NaOH and 1.0M HCl the same distance from a neutral SEVEN on the pH scale?

4) Does natural selection have an effect on species diversity?

5) Can glucose be a single-bonded hexagonal carbon chain where each carbon is single bonded with two other carbon (in the ring) and one H and one OH?

6) Do you guys know any site or sites that list all the hydrocarbon rules/ basic arrangements? I mean, not EVERY hydrocarbon, but just the different "varieties"--among suffixes, for example, what does the -ane, -anone, -etc...well, all the suffixes (even the ones I did not list)?

7) Is glucose and fructose the same C6H12O6 molecule? Is sucrose C12:H24:O11 or C11:H24:O12...

8) Why can oxygen only have one double bond or two single bonds?

9) What makes molecules right-handed or left-handed? What would change in molecular properties between different-handed molecules?

10) Sometimes fibers, i think, are added to ceramics to reduce brittleness/increase flexibility. Would that lower that particular ceramic's melting point?

11) About the triple point in phase diagrams: now I mean, theoritically, it is one specific temperature, right? But in reality---i mean, is it only one specific temperature? I mean, even if I differ by even a "sextillionth" of a degree/mmHg, we will not have three phases at all...only one/two at all at point? (maybe more water than ice, or more ice that vapor..but still, three? or only one/two?) (Would the substance really notice)

12) The curves on phase diagrams, between s/l/gas states...they're not solid lines, are they? I mean, same as above, but the same sextillionth difference in pressure/temperature---will the substance really notice?

13) Just to be sure, the curves on phase diagrams are EMPIRICALLY drawn...from Experimental Data, right? (best-fit lines?)

14) Now zero quanta (Plank's constant of energy levels) cannot exist, right? I mean, we cannot have "zero" energy, can we?

15) Now in net ionic equations of aqueous solutions, calcium hydroxide is considered soluble, right? In that case, wouldn't hydroxides of magnesium and beryllium ALSO be soluble as well?

16) Well, a slight allusion towards relativity theory, theory of relativity-------what is the GAS CONSTANT relative to?

17) Why must pressure be applied to freeze helium in addition to lowering temperature, rather than JUST lowering temperature to very low levels, as for the heavier noble gases?

18) Why do chromium and copper have irregular orbital descriptions?

19) What math and/or physics must I understand prior to understanding Schrodinger's wave function/equation---i.e., the exact equation and its precise reasoning?

20) Although H3PO4 is not considered a "Strong" acid (HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, HClO4), would 1.0M H3PO4 still be harmful/cause harm/tissue damage?

21) Well, now that I think about, HF could be hydroflouric acid, right?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
21)Yes,HF is hydrofluoric acid.
20)I frankly doubt it.
19)Classical mechanics and lots of linear algebra,complex analysis and functional analysis.
18) Check Hund's rules and how they help build the electronic structure of elements.

Daniel.
 
  • #3
dextercioby said:
21)Yes,HF is hydrofluoric acid.
Daniel.

Would HF hydroflouric acid be harmful?
 
  • #4
bomba923 said:
Would HF hydroflouric acid be harmful?

I think it has comething to do with the bones. It reacts with it to form calcium flouride, which blocks your blood vessels.

Thats what i heard :rolleyes: But someone do correct me if I am right or wrong with this..
 
  • #5
Btw, will all gases liquefy prior to achieving absolute zero??
and
who'll answer the few remaining questions in my thread?
 
  • #6
I will answer them if you will give your assurance that they are not homework. Many of the questions do not sound like homework - and are very good questions too - but some surely look like textbook problems.
 
  • #7
They're not homework problems; just a couple of curiousities I've had :smile:
(As for textbook problems''', I'm not sure_; I haven't scanned the textbook for that)
(i love question #16)
also, question #4 is not really chemistry--but I'm wondering though: natural selection will favor a more "fit" species, but would that imply lower genetic diversity among the organisms under consideration? I think it has no effect, but does it?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
What you say is bold. What I say isn't bold.

bomba923 said:
1) Nonpolar liquids are dangerous? How? What are some harmful nonpolar substances--how is nonpolarity harmful? I mean, why exactly?

nonpolarity is not harmful. Butter, oil, margarin, and fat are all nonpolar yet they are safe. Natural gas to heat your home, butane in your lighter, and gasoline in your car are all nonpolar.

2) Is it true that pure distilled water is harmful to drink? I mean pure, without impurities--just pure H2O; it seems safe, but is it really harmful? What will happen if I drink it?

It's a myth. People think that drinking pure water will lower the ion concentration in your blood. You would have incredible stomach pains from drinking too much water well before any kind of ion concentration changes would happen, and even then, sprinkling salt on your food would be enough to reverse any "damage" done by pure water.

3) Are 1.0M NaOH and 1.0M HCl the same distance from a neutral SEVEN on the pH scale?

They sure are. 1M HCl would have a pH of 0, and 1M NaOH would have a pOH of 0 (pH 14). 7 - 0 = 7 and 14 - 7 = 7.

4) Does natural selection have an effect on species diversity?

That is somewhat debatable. On one hand it can introduce changes/diversity to a species. On the other hand it can cause the complete elimination of diversity (peppered moth?).

5) Can glucose be a single-bonded hexagonal carbon chain where each carbon is single bonded with two other carbon (in the ring) and one H and one OH?

I would have to say no. Glucose turns into a ring via dehydration. That means 2 OH groups react with each other, water leaves, and you end with a cyclic ether. I can't imagine any way of getting carbon-carbon bonding all the way around the ring.

6) Do you guys know any site or sites that list all the hydrocarbon rules/ basic arrangements? I mean, not EVERY hydrocarbon, but just the different "varieties"--among suffixes, for example, what does the -ane, -anone, -etc...well, all the suffixes (even the ones I did not list)?

I don't know of any sites, but you could probably find some by searching for "IUPAC" naming. IUPAC is the name of the standard used for creating chemical names.

7) Is glucose and fructose the same C6H12O6 molecule? Is sucrose C12:H24:O11 or C11:H24:O12...

Glucose as a straight chain is an aldehyde whereas fructose is a ketone. That also affects the way they dehydrate. Sucrose is C12H22O11. You keep the same number of carbons when glucose and fructose dehydrate with each other, but you lose 1 oxygen and 2 hydrogens in the process.

8) Why can oxygen only have one double bond or two single bonds?

Atoms try to follow 2 basic rules: have 8 electrons in their general area (can be ignored by some complex ions), and the number of lone electrons and bonds should equal the atom's valence number. Suppose you want to draw water, H2O. You draw oxygen with 2 bonds, so that's 2 electrons in the immediate area, then you draw 4 lone electrons (2 pairs of electrons) to get a total of 6 electrons in the immediate area. Great, the oxygen is neutral (valence number matches number of electrons close to it). If we count all the electrons in the surrounding area, 4 lone electrons and 4 from bonds (each bond consists of 2 electrons), we get a total of 8. Now the octet is full; it works.
Suppose you wanted to draw oxygen with 3 bonds. That would give you 3 electrons in the immediate area, so then you would draw 3 lone electrons to balance the valence rule. Having an odd number of lone electrons would make alarms sound in your mind. Atoms with lone electrons that are not paired are called radicals, and they're incredibly unstable. That oxygen radical might just steal an electron from some other atom. So now we're up to 3 bonds with 4 lone electrons for a total of 7 electrons in the immediate area and 10 in a wider area. Too many electrons are in the form of bonds or pairs so you have a negative oxygen, and there octet rule isn't satisfied because you have 10 electrons instead of 8; obviously this just won't work.

Try nitrogen as an example. Nitrogen has a valence of 5 and it generally has 3 bonds. If you have 3 bonds you draw 2 electrons to satisfy the valence rule. 3 bonds with 2 lone electrons means a total of 8 electrons in a wider area; the octet rule is satisfied as well.

If what I said makes no sense, just ignore it. I tried explaining it to classmates when they were blown away by my ability to draw complex ions like sulfite with the correct number of lone pairs without doing any sort of dumb bond order/vsepr calculations, and nobody understood it. Althought it's technically wrong for explaining how the system works, it will always get the right answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
11) About the triple point in phase diagrams: now I mean, theoritically, it is one specific temperature, right? But in reality---i mean, is it only one specific temperature? I mean, even if I differ by even a "sextillionth" of a degree/mmHg, we will not have three phases at all...only one/two at all at point? (maybe more water than ice, or more ice that vapor..but still, three? or only one/two?) (Would the substance really notice)

It is a precise temperature AND pressure. If you added or removed a small amount of heat or changed the pressure slightly, then the equilibrium would be shifted, but there would still be three phases, and the temperature and pressure would still be the same

12) The curves on phase diagrams, between s/l/gas states...they're not solid lines, are they? I mean, same as above, but the same sextillionth difference in pressure/temperature---will the substance really notice?

When a substance undergoes a phase transition, the temperature remains constant until there is a complete transformation of the substance from one state to the other. You notice this when you do distillation - the vapor temperature will rise very rapidly - then stop at a specfic temperature until all of one substance has boiled away, then start rising again.

13) Just to be sure, the curves on phase diagrams are EMPIRICALLY drawn...from Experimental Data, right? (best-fit lines?)

For the most part yes, but there are models which produce good approximations, such as the Clausius-Clayperon equation for vapor pressure of a liquid.

14) Now zero quanta (Plank's constant of energy levels) cannot exist, right? I mean, we cannot have "zero" energy, can we?

No, a particle cannot possesses zero energy. If it did, we would know its possition with 100% certainy, which
violates the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

15) Now in net ionic equations of aqueous solutions, calcium hydroxide is considered soluble, right? In that case, wouldn't hydroxides of magnesium and beryllium ALSO be soluble as well?

Calcium hydroxide is only slightly soluble. Beryllium and Magnesium have higher ionization energies, and thus do not dissolve as well. This is because their valence electrons are closer to the nucleus, and their s orbital is filled, which makes a stable 'duet' . On a related note, beryllium and magnesium metal do not react with the hydroxide in water do not react in water without the prescence of a catalyst, while the group I and rest of the group II elements do.


16) Well, a slight allusion towards relativity theory, theory of relativity-------what is the GAS CONSTANT relative to?

I'm not sure what you mean by that. Do you mean would the gas constant change for someone who traveling at some speed relative to the gas?

17) Why must pressure be applied to freeze helium in addition to lowering temperature, rather than JUST lowering temperature to very low levels, as for the heavier noble gases?

Liquid helium behaves very strangely and I'm not sure there is a simple answer - but I suspect helium would be the most likely canidate of any of the noble gases to require pressure as well as lower pressure since its electrons are very close to the nucleus, and the forces present that cause a substance to remain in a liquid phase
(London dispersion forces) would be a lot less.

18) Why do chromium and copper have irregular orbital descriptions?

The energy levels for a given element are unque - the energy level of the 1s orbital in one element is different from the 1s another element. This is because as you add more electrons, they repel each other and change the allowed energy levels. As you increase the atomic number, the formula for the allowed energy levels gets more and more ugly - and even then its only an approximation because the wave equation has no closed form solution past n = 1. More over, the difference in energy between levels gets smaller and smaller. For chromium and copper, it just so happens that when you add an additional electron, it changes the energy level of all the electrons in a counter intuitive way. There are other exceptions to Hund's rule as well (e.g Cerium and Praseodymium (atomic numbers 58 and 59, respectively))
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ShawnD said:
3) Are 1.0M NaOH and 1.0M HCl the same distance from a neutral SEVEN on the pH scale?

They sure are. 1M HCl would have a pH of 0, and 1M NaOH would have a pOH of 0 (pH 14). 7 - 0 = 7 and 14 - 7 = 7.

For all practical purposes you are right. But if you want to be exact - no. Hydrochloric acid is much stronger (in terms of dissociation constant) that NaOH. To calculate exact values of pH of 1M solutions you have to use dissociation constants and the distance from the neutral pH will be not the same.

Take a look at http://www.chembuddy.com/index.php?left$=FAQ (third question). Also you may try BATE for these pH calculations:

1M HCl pH = 0.00
1M NaOH pH = 13.73


Chemical calculators for labs and education
BATE - pH calculations, titration curves, hydrolisis
 
  • #11
ShawnD said:
2) Is it true that pure distilled water is harmful to drink? I mean pure, without impurities--just pure H2O; it seems safe, but is it really harmful? What will happen if I drink it?

It's a myth. People think that drinking pure water will lower the ion concentration in your blood. You would have incredible stomach pains from drinking too much water well before any kind of ion concentration changes would happen, and even then, sprinkling salt on your food would be enough to reverse any "damage" done by pure water.

ShawnD, Check out this thread and see if you agree with its conclusions.
 
  • #12
Bladibla said:
bomba923 said:
Would HF hydroflouric acid be harmful?
I think it has comething to do with the bones. It reacts with it to form calcium flouride, which blocks your blood vessels.

Thats what i heard :rolleyes: But someone do correct me if I am right or wrong with this..

In addition to the ability of HF to cause severe burns, the liberated fluoride ion will scavenge all available calcium. In the long term this would have an effect on bone, but following sufficient exposure, you would die of ventricular fibrillation long before that due to calcium's role in nerve conduction and muscle contraction. Check this link for HF toxicity papers/reports.
 
  • #13
DocToxyn said:
ShawnD, Check out this thread and see if you agree with its conclusions.

I still call BS on the theory.
I've been drinking distilled water for 19 years and I'm as healthy as they come. Don't try to tell me my distilled water is impure because I checked the resistance in grade 10 to find that it really doesn't conduct electricity any better than normal air does.
 
  • #14
1) Nonpolar liquids are dangerous? How? What are some harmful nonpolar substances--how is nonpolarity harmful? I mean, why exactly?

ShawnD's got this mostly covered. I'd like to add one little bit. If there's a bucketfull of unknown (possibly poisonous liquid) sitting around, I'd be more careful about going near it if I was told that it's nonpolar. Why ? Because nonpolar liquids tend to have lower boiling points or higher vapor pressures, and I want to minimize the risk of inhaling noxious vapors.

2) Is it true that pure distilled water is harmful to drink? I mean pure, without impurities--just pure H2O; it seems safe, but is it really harmful? What will happen if I drink it?

There MAY be some long term effects from drinking deionized water; much less from distilled water. There have been at least 2 different threads discussing this matter here in PF.

3) Are 1.0M NaOH and 1.0M HCl the same distance from a neutral SEVEN on the pH scale?

Covered by Borek. x molar HCl will always have a slightly smaller value of pH than x molar NaOH's pOH value - because HCl has a higher dissociation constant. The difference, however gets smaller and smaller, the greater you make the concentrations. A more interesting question here might be : "What's the pH of 1.1M HCl ?"

4) Does natural selection have an effect on species diversity?

I'm almost positive it does. But I will not venture any further, for my ignorance in this field is quite extensive.

5) Can glucose be a single-bonded hexagonal carbon chain where each carbon is single bonded with two other carbon (in the ring) and one H and one OH?

You can have a "single-bonded hexagonal carbon chain where each carbon is single bonded with two other carbon (in the ring) and one H and one OH". Only, you wouldn't call that glucose. It would be a cyclohexanol.

Glucose is the name of a specific compound whose anhydrous structure is an aldol. In aqueous solution, it adopts the hemiacetal structure.


6) Do you guys know any site or sites that list all the hydrocarbon rules/ basic arrangements? I mean, not EVERY hydrocarbon, but just the different "varieties"--among suffixes, for example, what does the -ane, -anone, -etc...well, all the suffixes (even the ones I did not list)?

Google "IUPAC Nomenclature"
http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/class/
http://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/


7) Is glucose and fructose the same C6H12O6 molecule? Is sucrose C12:H24:O11 or C11:H24:O12...

8) Why can oxygen only have one double bond or two single bonds?

Explained in detail by ShawnD. Summary : O has 6 valence electrons and needs 8 for an octet, so it must share 2 of its electrons with 2 "external" electrons to get this octet. This can be achieved through either 2 single bonds or one double bond, but no other way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
Gokul43201 said:
If there's a bucketfull of unknown (possibly poisonous liquid) sitting around, I'd be more careful about going near it if I was told that it's nonpolar. Why ? Because nonpolar liquids tend to have lower boiling points or higher vapor pressures, and I want to minimize the risk of inhaling noxious vapors.

I think more nonpolar stuff also soaks into the brain a little faster/longer. The chemical difference between amphetamine and methamphetamine is just a methyl group to make it less polar, but that less polar methamphetamine is significantly more potent.
 
  • #16
9) What makes molecules right-handed or left-handed? What would change in molecular properties between different-handed molecules?

Google "chirality" - this is too big a topic to describe briefly, and without pictures. Any geometry dependent property changes with changing chirality. Particularly important are reactions such as the binding of enzymes to substrates.

10) Sometimes fibers, i think, are added to ceramics to reduce brittleness/increase flexibility. Would that lower that particular ceramic's melting point?

When you make a composite, you no longer have a single melting point. Often, each component melts at its own melting point. Sometimes, depending on factors like the size/distribution of the dispersed particles, you have a range of melting temperatures. In general. The effect on melting point is very case sensitive, but if you are worrying about the likelihood of damage to the composite at temperatures just below the mp of the ceramic, you are justified in that.

11) About the triple point in phase diagrams: now I mean, theoritically, it is one specific temperature, right? But in reality---i mean, is it only one specific temperature? I mean, even if I differ by even a "sextillionth" of a degree/mmHg, we will not have three phases at all...only one/two at all at point? (maybe more water than ice, or more ice that vapor..but still, three? or only one/two?) (Would the substance really notice)

In reality, you can be slightly off of a triple point and still see all three phases - thanks to thermal and pressure fluctuations, and the time constant for phase change - which, particularly in solids can be quite large.

12) The curves on phase diagrams, between s/l/gas states...they're not solid lines, are they? I mean, same as above, but the same sextillionth difference in pressure/temperature---will the substance really notice?

There are two kinds of phase transitions to distinguish between, here : (i) first order transitions (like the melting of a pure substance), and (ii) higher order transitions (lambda points). Only first order phase transitions (which insludes all common melting and boiling transitions) are represented by curves on a phase diagram. Higher order transitions occupy regions.

Even in the case of first order transitions, the "substance will not notice" if the difference in temperature is smaller than the size of thermal fluctuations. Remember, temperature (and pressure) is a macroscopic property that represents a statistical average.

13) Just to be sure, the curves on phase diagrams are EMPIRICALLY drawn...from Experimental Data, right? (best-fit lines?)

Yes, they are empirically drawn - usually from things known as CCCs (Continuous Cooling Curves) which are generated by experiment. Sometimes, theoretical corrections may be employed to account for some non-equilibrium condition imposed by the measurement system.

14) Now zero quanta (Plank's constant of energy levels) cannot exist, right? I mean, we cannot have "zero" energy, can we?

This question is vague. If you have a more specific question/context perhaps...
For now, you can have "zero quanta", but probably not in the kinds of cases you may have in mind.

15) Now in net ionic equations of aqueous solutions, calcium hydroxide is considered soluble, right? In that case, wouldn't hydroxides of magnesium and beryllium ALSO be soluble as well?

Why should they ? Are Mg(OH)2 and Be(OH)2 more ionic than Ca(OH)2 ?

16) Well, a slight allusion towards relativity theory, theory of relativity-------what is the GAS CONSTANT relative to?

What is this question relative to?

17) Why must pressure be applied to freeze helium in addition to lowering temperature, rather than JUST lowering temperature to very low levels, as for the heavier noble gases?

Pressure must be applied to freeze many fluids. Not all substances are solid at 0K and 0 atm. The choice of 10^5 Pa (1 atm) is an arbitrary number determined by the nature of our atmosphere.

Helium is a weakly interacting gas (I believe the 2-particle interaction is significantly smaller than those of other noble gases) and hence is liquid down to 0K at pressures up to a few atm. In addition, He4 is a bosonic atom and obeys the rules of Bose Statistics; which makes for surprising behavior at low temperatures. Recently, interesting experiments done at Penn State University (Moses Chan & E Kim, Nature 427 225, 2004) have suggested that solid He4 exhibits a property known as superfluidity...exciting stuff !
 
Last edited:
  • #17
18) Why do chromium and copper have irregular orbital descriptions?

Since Cr has z=24, one would expect it to have the config : [Ar] 4s2 3d4. Yet it prefers to exist as [Ar] 4s1 3d5 (the second 4s electron prefers to live in the 3d subshell instead). This is because half-filled subshells have "extra stability" making them nearly as favorable as fully filled subshells. Comparing the two above configurations, it is found that there is a greater reduction in energy going from 3d4 to 3d5 than there is in going from 4s1 to 4s2.

A similar argument works for Cu (z=29). You might naturally want to write the config as [Ar] 4s2 3d9, but from a similar argument as above, it is preferable for Cu to be in the state [Ar] 4s1 3d10.

19) What math and/or physics must I understand prior to understanding Schrodinger's wave function/equation---i.e., the exact equation and its precise reasoning?

Covered by Dexter

20) Although H3PO4 is not considered a "Strong" acid (HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, HClO4), would 1.0M H3PO4 still be harmful/cause harm/tissue damage?

While phosphoric acid is not as dangerous as acids like HCl or HNO3, it is still a pretty scary creature, and all the standard safety precautions must be used while handling (look up "phosphoric msds") it. It is very corrosive to the mucous membrane and parts of the respiratory system, but its vapor pressure is much lower than HCl or H2SO4, so good ventilation will mitigate the effect of vapors.

21) Well, now that I think about, HF could be hydroflouric acid, right?
Yes, but it's spelled 'hydrofluoric'.
 
  • #18
1) Benzene is carcinogenic
 

1. What are nonpolar liquids and how are they different from polar liquids?

Nonpolar liquids are substances that contain molecules with symmetrical distribution of charge. This means that the electrons are evenly distributed throughout the molecule, resulting in a neutral overall charge. On the other hand, polar liquids have an uneven distribution of charge, with one end of the molecule being slightly positive and the other end being slightly negative.

2. What are some examples of nonpolar liquids?

Common examples of nonpolar liquids include oils, gasoline, and hydrocarbons. Other examples include carbon tetrachloride, benzene, and toluene.

3. What are the harmful effects of nonpolar liquids?

Nonpolar liquids can have harmful effects on both human health and the environment. These substances can be toxic if ingested or inhaled, and can also cause skin irritation. They can also have negative effects on aquatic life and can contaminate soil and water sources if not properly disposed of.

4. How do nonpolar liquids interact with other substances?

Nonpolar liquids do not mix well with polar substances. This is because the polar molecules are attracted to each other, while the nonpolar molecules are not attracted to the polar molecules. Nonpolar liquids can dissolve other nonpolar substances, such as oils dissolving in gasoline, but they cannot dissolve polar substances like water.

5. What precautions should be taken when handling nonpolar liquids?

When handling nonpolar liquids, it is important to wear protective gear such as gloves, goggles, and a lab coat. These substances should be stored in a well-ventilated area to avoid inhalation, and should be disposed of properly according to safety guidelines. It is also important to avoid direct contact with skin and to wash hands thoroughly after handling nonpolar liquids.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top