MHB Find 4-adic Expansion of $\frac{1}{5}$ - Wondering

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the 4-adic expansion of 1/5, with the initial calculations leading to coefficients a_0=1, a_1=3, and a_2=0. The calculations reveal a pattern where the coefficients alternate between 3 and 0 after the initial term. The final result suggests that the 4-adic expansion of 1/5 can be expressed as (03)1.(0) in base 4. The discussion also highlights the distinction between quaternary and 4-adic number expansions, noting that they share the same arithmetic operations despite differing metric spaces. Overall, the thread concludes with the identification of the 4-adic representation of 1/5.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to find the $4$-adic expansion of $\frac{1}{5}$. I have done the following: $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}\equiv a_0\pmod 4 \Rightarrow a_0\equiv \frac{1}{5}\pmod 4}$
We multiply by $5$ and we get $\displaystyle{5a_0\equiv 1\pmod 4}$.
The only residue of division by $4$ that solves this is $a_0=1$. Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1\equiv 4a_1 \pmod {4^2} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}\equiv 4a_1\pmod {4^2}}$.
We divide by $4$ and we get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}\equiv a_1\pmod {4}}$.
We multiply then by $5$ and we get $\displaystyle{-1\equiv 5a_1\pmod {4}\Rightarrow 5a_1\equiv -1 \pmod 4 \Rightarrow 5a_1\equiv 3\pmod 4 \Rightarrow a_1\equiv 3\pmod 4}$. The only residue of division by $4$ that solves this is $a_1=3$. Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^2a_2 \pmod {4^3} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^2a_2\pmod {4^3}}$.
We multiply by $4$ and we get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}-3\equiv 4a_2\pmod {4^2}\Rightarrow -\frac{16}{5}\equiv 4a_2 \pmod {4^2}}$, we multiply then by $5$ and we get $\displaystyle{-16\equiv 20a_2\pmod {4^2} \Rightarrow 0\equiv 4a_2 \pmod {4^2} \Rightarrow 4a_2\equiv 0\pmod {4^2}}$. We divide by $4$ and we get $\displaystyle{a_2\equiv 0\pmod {4}}$. The only residue of division by $4$ that solves this is $a_2=0$. Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^3a_3 \pmod {4^4} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^3a_3\pmod {4^4}}$.
We divide by $4$ and we get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}-3\equiv 4^2a_3\pmod {4^3}\Rightarrow -\frac{16}{5}\equiv 4^2a_3 \pmod {4^3}}$, then we divide by $4^2$ and we get $\displaystyle{ -\frac{1}{5}\equiv a_3 \pmod 4}$. Then we multiply by $5$ and we get $\displaystyle{ -1\equiv 5a_3 \pmod 4\Rightarrow 5a_3\equiv -1 \pmod 4 \Rightarrow a_3\equiv 3 \pmod 4 }$. The only residue of division by $4$ that solves this is $a_3=1$.


Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1-3\cdot 4-4^3\equiv 4^4a_4 \pmod {4^5} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}-3\cdot 4-4^3\equiv 4^4a_4\pmod {4^5}}$.
We divide by $4$ and get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}-3-4^2\equiv 4^3a_4\pmod {4^4}\Rightarrow -\frac{16}{5}-4^2\equiv 4^3a_4 \pmod {4^4}}$, then we divide by $4^2$ and get $\displaystyle{ -\frac{1}{5}-1\equiv 4a_4 \pmod 4^2 \Rightarrow -\frac{6}{5}\equiv 4a_4 \pmod {4^2}}$. We multiply then by $5$ and get $\displaystyle{ -6\equiv 20a_4 \pmod {4^2}\Rightarrow 20a_4\equiv -6 \pmod {4^2} \Rightarrow 4a_4\equiv 10 \pmod {4^2} }$.
This doesn't have a solution, right?

Where have I done something wrong? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
I want to find the $4$-adic expansion of $\frac{1}{5}$. I have done the following:

.
.
.

Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^3a_3 \pmod {4^4} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}-3\cdot 4\equiv 4^3a_3\pmod {4^4}}$.
We divide by $4$ and we get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}-3\equiv 4^2a_3\pmod {4^3}\Rightarrow -\frac{16}{5}\equiv 4^2a_3 \pmod {4^3}}$, then we divide by $4^2$ and we get $\displaystyle{ -\frac{1}{5}\equiv a_3 \pmod 4}$. Then we multiply by $5$ and we get $\displaystyle{ -1\equiv 5a_3 \pmod 4\Rightarrow 5a_3\equiv -1 \pmod 4 \Rightarrow {\color{red}a_3\equiv 3 \pmod 4 }}$. The only residue of division by $4$ that solves this is $\color{red}a_3=\Huge 3$.


Then we have $\displaystyle{\frac{1}{5}-1-3\cdot 4-4^3\equiv 4^4a_4 \pmod {4^5} \Rightarrow -\frac{4}{5}-3\cdot 4-4^3\equiv 4^4a_4\pmod {4^5}}$.
We divide by $4$ and get $\displaystyle{-\frac{1}{5}-3-4^2\equiv 4^3a_4\pmod {4^4}\Rightarrow -\frac{16}{5}-4^2\equiv 4^3a_4 \pmod {4^4}}$, then we divide by $4^2$ and get $\displaystyle{ -\frac{1}{5}-1\equiv 4a_4 \pmod 4^2 \Rightarrow -\frac{6}{5}\equiv 4a_4 \pmod {4^2}}$. We multiply then by $5$ and get $\displaystyle{ -6\equiv 20a_4 \pmod {4^2}\Rightarrow 20a_4\equiv -6 \pmod {4^2} \Rightarrow 4a_4\equiv 10 \pmod {4^2} }$.
This doesn't have a solution, right?

Where have I done something wrong? (Wondering)
It looks as though the coefficients will be alternately $3$ and $0$ (after the initial $1$).
 
Show that 1/5 is ...
View attachment 6286

Using () to represent the repeated digits under the vinculum and everything base 4.
Then show that 1/5 is ...
(03)1.(0)

Step 1: Calculate 4/5 (base 4)

Code:
      0.3030...
    ------------
11 / 10.0000...
      3 3
      ---
        100
         33
        ---
          etc.


Step 2: Calculate -4/5 (4-adic)
Notice that
if n = ...3030.3030...
then 100 n = n
Therefore n=0
and
-4/5 = (03)0.(0)Step 3: Calculate 1/5 (4-adic)
using 1/5 = 1+(-4/5)
1/5 = (03)1.(0)Note: Quaternary and 4-adic number expansions have different metric spaces. However, they share the same arithmetic for the + and * operations.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    3.7 KB · Views: 111
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top