- #1
tachyons
- 4
- 0
I agree with the 'may or may not' . Von Neuman was a mixed blessing to QM, his 'proof' about HV theories was misleading and shows how pure mathematics cannot alone make physical predictions.Fra said:Analysing the logic of whatever quasi or semi formal systems we have at the moment, may or may not help us evolve more efficiently.
/Fredrik
Not true, of course. I think what I mean is that von Neumans HV theory is meta-physics, since it is about physical theories rather than things.pure mathematics cannot alone make physical predictions.
Yes, just.I think you got away with it
Mentz114 said:Not true, of course. I think what I mean is that von Neumans HV theory is meta-physics, since it is about physical theories rather than things.
Godels theorem is a meta-something as well and therefore outside the realm of physical reality.
Yes, just.
reilly said:There's no way physics can be reduced to any sort of formal system. The human element will screw up any formal stuff. In fact to capture physics in some formal system, one would need to encapsulate human behavior in a formal system. Lot's 'a luck.
Humans are very inventive, so that, in my opinion, given a Godel question, someone will define a new, larger system in which the Godel question beomes ordinary, non-Godel one. Think about i**2 = -1, as one example of surmounting "logical barriers," non-Euclidean geometry is another good example, as is the germ theory of disease, and on and on.
Godel incompleteness, also known as Godel's incompleteness theorems, are two theorems in mathematical logic that have implications for the foundations of mathematics and other fields such as physics. They were proven by mathematician Kurt Godel in 1931 and state that any consistent mathematical system cannot be both complete and self-consistent.
Godel incompleteness suggests that there will always be statements within a mathematical system that cannot be proven to be true or false. This means that there will always be limitations to our understanding of the physical world, as many physical theories rely on mathematical systems. It also implies that there will always be room for new discoveries and advancements in our understanding of physics.
Yes, Godel incompleteness can be applied to any mathematical system, including those used in physics. This includes theories such as relativity, quantum mechanics, and string theory. It is a fundamental property of mathematics and therefore applies to all branches of science that utilize mathematical models.
The concept of a "theory of everything" refers to a hypothetical theory that can explain all physical phenomena in the universe. However, Godel incompleteness suggests that such a theory is impossible. This is because any consistent mathematical system, including a "theory of everything", will always have statements that cannot be proven within that system.
No, Godel's incompleteness theorems are a fundamental limitation of mathematics and cannot be overcome or resolved. However, they do not hinder scientific progress as they simply show that there will always be room for further discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the physical world.