Hamilton Operator for particle on a circle -- Matrix representation....

In summary, the conversation discusses the Hamiltonian operator in quantum mechanics and how to represent it in matrix form. The appropriate basis for this representation is a set of eigenvectors of the operator, and the matrix elements can be calculated using an integral. The conversation also mentions that the Hamiltonians provided are incorrect and that using polar coordinates is a more reasonable approach.
  • #1
JonnyMaddox
74
1
Hey JO.

The Hamiltonian is:
[itex]H= \frac{p_{x}^{2}+p_{y}^{2}}{2m}[/itex]

In quantum Mechanics:
[itex]\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}})[/itex]

In polar coordinates:
[itex]\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}( \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \phi^{2}})[/itex]

Now I want to write this operator in matrix form. What is an appropriate basis? I thought a good would be {sin(x),sin(2x),sin(3x),...,sin(nx)} Now how do I do that in a two dimensional space? What is the basis for that? Something like {sin(x),sin(y),...sin(nx),sin(ny)} ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your Hamiltonians are wrong. The first two Hamiltonians are for a free particle in two dimensions, not for a particle on a circle. Anyway, its not reasonable to do this in Cartesian coordinates.
Going to polar coordinates, and noticing that there is only one degree of freedom(the azimuthal angle), the Hamiltonian is ## \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2} ##.

Now consider the set of basis vectors ##\{|\psi_n\rangle\} ##. The matrix elements of an operator ## \hat S ## w.r.t. this set of basis vectors is defined as ## S_{mn}=\langle \psi_m|\hat S|\psi_n\rangle ##. The basis vectors don't have to be related to the operator but a convenient basis for this job is a basis in which the matrix ##S_{mn}## is diagonal. So the set of eigenvectors of the operator ## \hat S ##(##\hat S|\psi_m\rangle=\lambda_m|\psi_m\rangle##) is a convenient basis.

When the operator is a differential operator and the vectors are functions, the matrix elements can be calculated using an integral ## S_{mn}=\int_{\zeta_1}^{\zeta_2} \phi_m(\zeta) \hat S \phi_n(\zeta) d\zeta ##. For the above Hamiltonian, ##\zeta## is the azimuthal angle ##\phi## and the range of integration is 0 to 2π and the eigenfunctions are exponential functions with imaginary exponents which can also be written as the sum of sines and cosines if you want. Note that there are an infinite number of eigenfunctions and so the matrix ## H_{mn} ## will be infinite dimensional.
 

1. What is the Hamilton Operator for a particle on a circle?

The Hamilton Operator for a particle on a circle is a mathematical representation of the total energy of the particle as it moves along a circular path. It takes into account both the kinetic energy and potential energy of the particle.

2. Why is the Hamilton Operator important for studying particles on a circle?

The Hamilton Operator is important because it allows us to calculate the energy levels and eigenstates of the particle on a circle. It also helps us understand the dynamics of the particle and how it interacts with its environment.

3. How is the Hamilton Operator represented in matrix form?

The Hamilton Operator for a particle on a circle can be represented as a 2x2 matrix. The diagonal elements represent the kinetic energy term, while the off-diagonal elements represent the potential energy term.

4. What does the eigenvalue of the Hamilton Operator represent?

The eigenvalue of the Hamilton Operator represents the energy level of the particle. The corresponding eigenvector represents the state of the particle at that energy level.

5. How does the Hamilton Operator for a particle on a circle differ from that of a particle on a line?

The Hamilton Operator for a particle on a circle takes into account the periodic nature of the motion, while the Hamilton Operator for a particle on a line does not. This results in a different set of eigenvalues and eigenstates for the two systems.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
411
Replies
7
Views
569
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
827
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
56
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
886
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top