How to list arXiv papers on NSF final report

In summary, the conversation is about a person who had an NSF fellowship from 2009 to 2011 and now needs to fill out a final report. They are unsure of which section to list their arXiv articles under, as the options do not seem entirely appropriate. They called the NSF for guidance and were advised to list all arXiv papers with semicolons and write one summary for all of them. They are now questioning whether to present a general idea and mention the papers in context, or have separate sections for each paper. The advice given is to follow the instructions given by the NSF and ask for clarification if needed.
  • #1
causalset
73
0
I had NSF fellowship for the period of 2009 -- 2011, and now I have to fill out final report. When I am trying to fill out the section "publications and products" of my NSF report, it gives me four options:

a) Journal publications
b) Books
c) Internet dissemination
d) Other specific product

My question is which of these should I list my arXiv articles under? Should I list it under "c" (internet dissemination)? I am not sure whehter this is entirely appropriate since that section asks me for internet websites, but when I make arXiv post it is not my own domain; the domain is still arXiv.org On the other hand, if I list it under "journals" it doesn't seem appropriate either since arXiv is not really a journal. Finally, "other specific product" seems to be asking me about practical products people can use which again feels like it is inappropriate since my papers are not really "products".

I tried to list it under "Internet dissemination", but then I encountered another problem while doing so. Namely, it asks me for ONE website, but I have several arXiv posts. When I called NSF and asked them this question, they told me to separate them by semicolons. But then I asked them how about description below: what can I do to make separate description for each of the arXiv posts? Their answer was that there is nothing that can be done about it: it has to be one description for all of them. This makes me wonder again whether perhaps it was not appropriate section to list arZXiv under.

Anyway, let me give you a description of how I go there:

1. Log in under PI/co-PI management (I am considered to be my own PI)

2. Go to "Award and reporting functions"

3. Go to "Project reports system"

4. Click on the award number that they list

5. Click on "create/edit"

6. Click "continue"

7. Click on "publications and products"

8. There you will see the options a-d I talked about above

Anyway please let me know what is best to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.

I mean wahat they told me to do was to list all of my arXiv papers with semicolons and write ONE summary for all of them. My question is this: should I

A. Present a general idea and mention these different arXiv papers in context of this general idea

or

B. Have few different "chapters" of my essay, one per each arXiv?
 
  • #4
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. If you don't understand it, ask them for clarification, and then do it.
 
  • #5


I understand your confusion about where to list your arXiv papers on your NSF final report. After reviewing the options provided, I would suggest listing your arXiv papers under "Internet dissemination". While arXiv is not your own personal website, it is still a platform for disseminating your research to the public. Additionally, the fact that you have multiple arXiv posts can be addressed by separating them with semicolons, as suggested by NSF.
However, if you feel that "Internet dissemination" is not an appropriate category, you could also consider listing your arXiv papers under "Other specific product". While your papers may not be tangible products, they are still a result of your research and can be considered as a product of your work.
Ultimately, the most important thing is to accurately and clearly represent your publications and products in your final report. If you have any further concerns, I would recommend reaching out to your program officer at NSF for guidance. They will be able to provide you with the most accurate and specific information for your individual case. Thank you for your attention to detail in properly reporting your research.
 

1. What is the purpose of listing arXiv papers on an NSF final report?

The purpose is to provide evidence of the research and publications that have resulted from the NSF-funded project. This helps to demonstrate the impact and dissemination of the project's outcomes.

2. How do I know if my arXiv paper is eligible to be listed on an NSF final report?

arXiv papers that have been accepted and published in a peer-reviewed journal or conference proceedings are eligible to be listed on an NSF final report. Preprints or papers that have not yet been accepted are not typically accepted as evidence of project outcomes.

3. Do I need to list all of my arXiv papers on the NSF final report?

No, you do not need to list all of your arXiv papers. Only those that are directly related to the NSF-funded project and have been accepted and published in a peer-reviewed journal or conference proceedings should be included.

4. How do I cite my arXiv paper on the NSF final report?

You can cite your arXiv paper in the same way you would cite a published paper, using the arXiv identifier in place of the journal or conference information. For example: Author. (Year). Title of paper. Journal or conference information. arXiv:arXiv identifier.

5. Can I include a link to my arXiv paper on the NSF final report?

Yes, you can include a link to your arXiv paper in the list of publications or in the citation for the paper. This can provide additional evidence and accessibility for reviewers of the final report.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
783
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
931
Back
Top