B Infinite multiverse would contain the ridiculous?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew Wright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Multiverse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of an infinite multiverse, particularly regarding the existence of absurd universes, such as one with a chocolate teapot orbiting Pluto. Participants debate whether an infinite number of universes necessarily implies the existence of all conceivable configurations, arguing that while the multiverse is infinite, not all imagined scenarios must exist within it. Concepts from set theory and measure theory are introduced to explain how infinite sets can overlap without containing every possibility, suggesting that some configurations, while theoretically possible, may have a measure of zero in reality. The conversation highlights the complexities of probability in infinite sets and the distinction between theoretical existence and practical occurrence. Ultimately, the nature of infinity and its implications for the multiverse remain a topic of deep inquiry and debate.
  • #51
mfb said:
Yes.
Would the answer have changed if the expression were "chocolate crockery" instead?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #52
What was that thing about spaghetti monsters? ;)
 
  • #53
This is not a teapot :D
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    17.6 KB · Views: 451
  • #54
I think that conscious spaghetti is an invalid configuration of matter. Someone back me up here!
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #55
But seriously, even quantum mechanics would have some invalid configurations, like the exclusion principle (or is that just an approximation?)
 
  • #56
EnumaElish said:
Would the answer have changed if the expression were "chocolate crockery" instead?
The answer would not change for anything you can assemble, and not even for some things you cannot assemble today.
Andrew Wright said:
But seriously, even quantum mechanics would have some invalid configurations, like the exclusion principle (or is that just an approximation?)
The exclusion principle is absolute. You cannot have anything that violates the laws of physics, by definition of laws of physics.
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish

Similar threads

Back
Top