- #1
maverick280857
- 1,789
- 4
Hello friends,
I'm reading about PDEs and my textbook lists 'integrals' of the pde
[tex]f(x,y,z,p,q) = 0[/tex]
where [itex]p = \partial z/\partial x[/itex] and [itex]q = \partial z/\partial y[/itex], as
1. Complete Integral
2. General Integral
3. Singular Integral
4. Special Integral (solution that can't be classified into the above three categories...and can't be obtained from the general integral).
Specifically, I have the following questions:
1. What is the geometrical/physical significance of each of these 'integral' solutions, esp the singular solution of the PDE?
2. Let [itex]z = F(x,y,a)[/itex] be a one parameter family of solutions of the above PDE, parametrized by [itex]a[/itex]. Then the envelope of this family, if it exists, also satisfies the PDE. What is the geometrical significance of this theorem?
Thanks.
I'm reading about PDEs and my textbook lists 'integrals' of the pde
[tex]f(x,y,z,p,q) = 0[/tex]
where [itex]p = \partial z/\partial x[/itex] and [itex]q = \partial z/\partial y[/itex], as
1. Complete Integral
2. General Integral
3. Singular Integral
4. Special Integral (solution that can't be classified into the above three categories...and can't be obtained from the general integral).
Specifically, I have the following questions:
1. What is the geometrical/physical significance of each of these 'integral' solutions, esp the singular solution of the PDE?
2. Let [itex]z = F(x,y,a)[/itex] be a one parameter family of solutions of the above PDE, parametrized by [itex]a[/itex]. Then the envelope of this family, if it exists, also satisfies the PDE. What is the geometrical significance of this theorem?
Thanks.