Missing 24 Micron Counterparts for Methanol Multibeam Sources

In summary, the missing 24 micron counterparts for methanol multibeam sources are significant because they provide crucial information about the physical properties and evolution of these sources and can aid in understanding the mechanisms behind methanol production. The absence of these counterparts can significantly impact our understanding of the sources and may indicate other factors at play. Possible causes include a lack of sensitivity in observations, contamination, or different physical environments. Higher sensitivity instruments and alternative observations may help find these missing counterparts. The absence of these counterparts also presents new challenges and questions for future research, emphasizing the need for comprehensive observations and theoretical studies to fully understand methanol multibeam sources and their physical properties.
  • #1
sonutabitha
8
0
I was searching for 24 micron counterparts(in the MIPSGAL catalogue) for Methanol Multibeam sources but found them missing for most of the cases. What could be the posssible reason?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The possible reason for the missing 24 micron counterparts in the MIPSGAL catalogue for Methanol Multibeam sources could be that the faint objects, or sources, may not have been detected at 24 microns due to their low brightness. In addition, the sources may not have been resolved at 24 microns, and thus, would not appear in the MIPSGAL catalogue.
 

1. What is the significance of the missing 24 micron counterparts for methanol multibeam sources?

The 24 micron counterparts for methanol multibeam sources are important because they provide valuable information about the physical properties and evolution of these sources. They can also help us understand the mechanisms behind the production of methanol in these sources.

2. How do these missing counterparts affect our understanding of the methanol multibeam sources?

The absence of 24 micron counterparts can significantly impact our understanding of the physical processes and conditions in these sources. It may also indicate that there are other factors at play, such as a lack of dust or a different mechanism for producing methanol than previously thought.

3. What could be causing the missing 24 micron counterparts for methanol multibeam sources?

There could be several reasons for the absence of 24 micron counterparts. It could be due to a lack of sensitivity in the observations, contamination from other sources, or a different physical environment than expected. Further research is needed to determine the exact cause.

4. Are there any potential solutions to finding these missing counterparts?

One potential solution is to use higher sensitivity instruments or observe at different wavelengths to try and detect the missing counterparts. It may also be helpful to compare with similar sources or conduct theoretical studies to better understand the physical conditions of these sources.

5. What are the implications of these missing counterparts for future research in this field?

The absence of 24 micron counterparts raises new questions and challenges for future research in this field. It highlights the need for more comprehensive observations and theoretical studies to fully understand the nature of methanol multibeam sources and their physical properties. It also highlights the importance of considering all possible factors and sources of uncertainty in scientific research.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
4
Views
807
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
983
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top