- #1
heartless
- 220
- 2
Hello all,
First I'd like to say that I'm not a great scientists nor a great thinker. All I do is try to derive a common logic.
A few days ago, I had a lesson on "how do mutations affect us." And so I copied all the definitions into my notebook. One of them was 'Germ-line mutation" and "Somatic mutation." My teacher asked, "which one do you think is the worse one?" It's logical that the first one, because mutations aren't any good, as far as I observed and Think and so if something bad happens to you, it's better that it doesn't pass to the next person. Then I thought about evolution right away.
Those monkeys "millions of years ago..." had to have many frequent good mutations to evolve into us and if so, some of them should be visible in today's monkeys. Or even we should see frequent good mutations of humans, but yet we do not. Why is it? And what's wrong with my thinking?
Thanks,
First I'd like to say that I'm not a great scientists nor a great thinker. All I do is try to derive a common logic.
A few days ago, I had a lesson on "how do mutations affect us." And so I copied all the definitions into my notebook. One of them was 'Germ-line mutation" and "Somatic mutation." My teacher asked, "which one do you think is the worse one?" It's logical that the first one, because mutations aren't any good, as far as I observed and Think and so if something bad happens to you, it's better that it doesn't pass to the next person. Then I thought about evolution right away.
Those monkeys "millions of years ago..." had to have many frequent good mutations to evolve into us and if so, some of them should be visible in today's monkeys. Or even we should see frequent good mutations of humans, but yet we do not. Why is it? And what's wrong with my thinking?
Thanks,