Normalization of Radial wavefunction of hydrogen atom

Arafat Sagar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
All I need to evaluate the normalization coefficient. I need a step by step guide. It will be a great help if someone please tell me where can i get the solution (with intermediate steps). I think the solution can be done using the orthogonal properties of associated Laguerre polynomial. I need the steps. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • NormHydRad.png
    NormHydRad.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 5,472
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks a lot. the book contains the solution. but i still have one more confusion. the radial wavefunction (normalized) in the book has a minus sign. but i found many places where the minus sign has not been included. though the probability density requires the mod square of ψ, i want to know the shape of ψ. hence, what is the real value of it? should i include minus sign?
 

Attachments

  • radWavfunc.png
    radWavfunc.png
    10 KB · Views: 1,033
Wavefunctions are always uncertain up to a phase. So you can multiply the wavefunction by -1, or in fact by any number of the form exp(i * phi) where phi is any real value, without changing any observables.
 
i have an equation,
f(ρ) = \rho^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

i want to transform it to the following multiplying only the right hand side with (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1},
f(ρ) = (-1)^{2l+1}(2\rho)^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

is it possible?

i want to use (2\rho)^{l+1} instead of \rho^{l+1}, because, the normalization coefficient normalizes with respect to ρ whatever the the function f(ρ) is. and (2)^{l+1} is not a function of ρ.

i want to multiply by (-1)^{2l+1}, because i found that if the associated Laguerre polynomial is AL^{2l+1}_{n+l}(x)=\frac{d^{2l+1}}{dx^{2l+1}}L^{}_{n+l}(x). now, in some places, i found A=1 and other places A=(-1)^{2l+1}. besides, is it something related to Condon-Shortley Phase factor?
as after multiplyng by anything which is not a function of \rho will still satisfy the associated laguerre differential equation, can i do this multiplication of (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1}? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top