PCB design: multiple layers vs heavier copper

In summary, the conversation discusses the different options for designing a board with high current and the benefits of using one configuration over the others. The use of heavier copper is preferred for thermal reasons, but cost and electromagnetic issues must also be considered. It is recommended to use a two-sided board for better heat dissipation and to pay attention to the current distribution in vias. The use of conductive epoxy filled vias is not commonly seen in power circuits, and it may be better to use normal vias with no solder mask. The issue of heat flow and getting it away from the PCB is also discussed, with techniques such as reserving edges for copper and using thermal vias for convective cooling. Ultimately, consulting with a PCB fabricator
  • #1
willDavidson
50
6
TL;DR Summary
I am considering if I should use heavier copper or additional layers if thermal issues are a concern
I am designing a board which will have relatively high current. The options are to use heavier copper (4 oz), use two layers (2 oz), or 4 layers (1 oz).

Are there any benefits to using one configuration over the others?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
In general I go with heavier copper mostly for thermal reasons. The mitigating factors are whether this is an isolated portion of an otherwise low power board and possibly cost. And of course all of the usual EM issues which may or may not be at work here
 
  • #3
This will be a power plane so no traces on it. Only cutouts for clearance purposes. Is it better thermally basically a lower number count typically means less insulation which means less trapped heat within the board? I'm new to this. What kind of EM issues would you consider?
 
  • #4
The vias on multilayer also have a maximum current they can handle even if you put a bunch of vias on there the current distribution is usually not uniform... meaning that it's possible without careful placement for most of the current to go through a small number of vias.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and Tom.G
  • #5
Ok thanks I'll make sure to pay attention to the current in the vias. Does having heavier copper somehow help current sharing in the vias?
 
  • #6
Heavier copper will be better for your application so you will definitely want to do that no matter your choice, but it will not help with current sharing.
 
  • #7
willDavidson said:
Are there any benefits to using one configuration over the others?
Yes.
Avoid internal layers that will trap heat. (Rules out 4 x 1 oz ).
Use a two sided board so heat can be radiated from both sides. (Rules out 1 x 4 oz ).
Only the 2 layers x 2 oz remains.
Run wide tracks for high current on both sides where possible.
Use component leads to connect between the two sides.
A field of vias (that are filled with solder) may be used to transfer heat between the two sides.
 
  • #8
Baluncore said:
A field of vias (that are filled with solder) may be used to transfer heat between the two sides.

I read about conductive epoxy filled vias. Is somehow adding solder to them better at conducting heat? I know that having them filled with conductive epoxy will be more expensive so I'm not considering that for now.
 
  • #9
willDavidson said:
I read about conductive epoxy filled vias. Is somehow adding solder to them better at conducting heat? I know that having them filled with conductive epoxy will be more expensive so I'm not considering that for now.
I've never seen this in practice for power circuits. You will be better off with normal vias to the outside (not buried vias) with no solder mask so the solder fills the vias. However, if your PBCA is all surface mount then you need to be sure that solder paste is applied to the vias you care about.

I think @Joshy already implied this, but I'll rephrase. Be careful about breaks in the plane layers that concentrate current. It's not just the thickness that transfers heat it's also the width. This can be a difficult issue near devices with lots of interconnects because of the trace vias that break the plane. If you know that your heat flow is mostly in one direction, try to line up your trace vias parallel to that direction instead of across it.

I think your question is good, but, In my experience, the problem with heat generated inside a PCB isn't the local heating, you can fix that with more Cu to spread it out, as you have suggested. The bigger problem is getting the heat away from the PCB. Unfortunately the fiberglass in PCBs is a poor heat conductor. If you have a large PCB with only a few hot places, then this may not be a problem.

One technique is to reserve the edges of the board for lots of Cu and lots of thermal vias to outer Cu layers and mount with a heat conducting path (like a heatsink of some sort) to get the heat out. Electrical insulation is probably needed; there are good thermal conductive films available for this, as you might use for power transistor mounting, for example.

If/where you can add Cu to the outer layers with thermal vias to the internal planes to allow convective cooling. However, don't expect a dramatic improvement. Convective cooling down at the board level is often poor.

For extreme cases there are people who make ridiculously large Cu layers (like 20 oz.). Here is a link that I chose at random about this sort of PCB: https://www.epectec.com/articles/heavy-copper-pcb-design.html

Finally, for questions like 2x 2oz. layers vs. 4x 1oz. layers, I have found that the good PCB fabricators can be a valuable source of information. They understand better than us the cost and manufacturability issues involved.
 

1. What is the difference between multiple layers and heavier copper in PCB design?

Multiple layers refer to the number of copper layers in a PCB, while heavier copper refers to the thickness of the copper layers. A PCB with multiple layers has more layers of copper, while a PCB with heavier copper has thicker copper layers.

2. Which one is better for my PCB design, multiple layers or heavier copper?

The choice between multiple layers and heavier copper depends on the specific requirements of your PCB design. Multiple layers are useful for designs that require complex routing and high density of components, while heavier copper is beneficial for designs that require high current-carrying capacity.

3. Can I have both multiple layers and heavier copper in my PCB design?

Yes, it is possible to have both multiple layers and heavier copper in a PCB design. This is known as a "hybrid" design, where some layers have heavier copper while others have thinner copper. This allows for a balance between high density and high current-carrying capacity.

4. Does using multiple layers or heavier copper affect the cost of my PCB design?

Generally, using multiple layers will increase the cost of a PCB design compared to a design with a single layer. This is because multiple layers require more materials and manufacturing processes. On the other hand, using heavier copper may also increase the cost due to the higher cost of thicker copper. However, the cost may be offset by the benefits of improved performance and reliability.

5. Are there any limitations to using multiple layers or heavier copper in PCB design?

There are certain limitations to consider when using multiple layers or heavier copper in PCB design. For multiple layers, the main limitation is the complexity of the design, as it may require more time and expertise to route the traces and vias. For heavier copper, the main limitation is the availability of materials and manufacturing capabilities, as not all PCB manufacturers may offer thicker copper options. Additionally, both options may increase the overall size and weight of the PCB, which may be a limitation in certain applications.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
914
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
904
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
804
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
853
Back
Top