Prove that ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0 \iff ||x + cy|| \geq ||x||##.

In summary, we have shown that in a real Euclidean space, if we are given the condition that ##||x+cy||^2 \geq ||x||^2## for all real ##c##, then we can conclude that ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0##. This is proven by analyzing the quadratic function ##q(c) = \|y\|^2c^2 + 2c\langle x,y\rangle## and determining that in order for ##q(c)## to be non-negative for all ##c##, the only possible value for the other root (besides ##c=0##) is when ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0##. This
  • #1
Hall
351
87
Homework Statement
Prove that ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0 \iff ||x =cy|| \geq ||x||## for all real c.
Relevant Equations
A few of them.
(We are working in a real Euclidean space) So, we have to show two things: (1)the arrow goes from left to right, (2) the arrow comes from right to left.

(1) if we're given ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0 ##
$$
|| x+ cy||^2 = \langle x,x \rangle + 2c\langle x,y\rangle +c^2 \langle y,y \rangle $$
$$
||x+cy||^2 = ||x||^2 + c^2||y||^2 +2c\langle x,y\rangle$$
$$||x+cy||^2 = ||x||^2 || + c^2||y||^2$$
As ## c^2 ||y||^2 \geq 0##, we have ## ||x+cy||^2 \geq ||x||^2##.

(2) If we're given that ## ||x+cy||^2 \geq ||x||^2##, all that we can do is expand ##||x+cy||^2## and proceed
$$
||x||^2 +c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c \langle x, y \rangle \geq ||x||^2 $$
$$
c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c \langle x, y \rangle \geq 0$$

But how to conclude that ## \langle x, y\rangle = 0##. This is one of the archetypical case when we have to move backwards in mathematics.

All I can do is to say, if ##c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c \langle x, y \rangle \geq 0## has to be true for all real c, the case may arise for some negative c such that ##2c \langle x, y \rangle ## may exceed ##c^2 ||y||^2 ## and so to rule out that possibility we must make ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0##. What do you say about that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hall said:
$$
c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c \langle x, y \rangle \geq 0$$
That is a function of ##c##, so you could use calculus.
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
That is a function of ##c##, so you could use calculus.
Differentiating with respect to ##c##,
$$
c ||y||^2 + \langle x,y \rangle \geq 0$$
 
  • #4
Hall said:
Differentiating with respect to ##c##,
$$
c ||y||^2 + \langle x,y \rangle \geq 0$$
That's not like any calculus I've seen.
$$f(c) \ge 0 \ \Rightarrow \ f'(c) \ge 0 \ (\text{?})$$
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
That's not like any calculus I've seen.
$$f(c) \ge 0 \ \Rightarrow \ f'(c) \ge 0 \ (\text{?})$$
Oh! I simply differentiated both the sides, taking inequality, by mistake, as the equality.
 
  • Wow
Likes PeroK
  • #6
PeroK said:
That is a function of ##c##, so you could use calculus.
Can you please amplify the hint a little more?
 
  • #7
Hall said:
$$
c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c \langle x, y \rangle \geq 0$$

But how to conclude that ## \langle x, y\rangle = 0##.

Let [itex]q(c) = \|y\|^2c^2 + 2c\langle x,y\rangle[/itex]. Now [itex]q[/itex] is a quadratic in [itex]c[/itex] with real coefficients. The coefficient of [itex]c^2[/itex] is positive, so the condition that [itex]q(c) \geq 0[/itex] for all [itex]c[/itex] is equivalent to the condition that [itex]q[/itex] has at most one distinct real root. It is obvious that [itex]c = 0[/itex] is a root. What is the other?
 
  • Like
Likes Infrared
  • #8
Hall said:
Can you please amplify the hint a little more?
You know that ##f(c) \ge 0## for all ##c##. Why not do an analysis of ##f(c)## regarding turning points, maxima and minima?
 
  • #9
pasmith said:
Let [itex]q(c) = \|y\|^2c^2 + 2c\langle x,y\rangle[/itex]. Now [itex]q[/itex] is a quadratic in [itex]c[/itex] with real coefficients. The coefficient of [itex]c^2[/itex] is positive, so the condition that [itex]q(c) \geq 0[/itex] for all [itex]c[/itex] is equivalent to the condition that [itex]q[/itex] has at most one distinct real root. It is obvious that [itex]c = 0[/itex] is a root. What is the other?
$$
\frac{ 2 \langle x,y\rangle } {||y||^2}=0$$
$$
\langle x, y \rangle =0$$
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
You know that ##f(c) \ge 0## for all ##c##. Why not do an analysis of ##f(c)## regarding turning points, maxima and minima?
There is some c such that f'(c)=0. But our function could be strictly increasing?
 
  • #11
Hall said:
There is some c such that f'(c)=0.
We have a quadratic in ##c## and can find the minimum by calculus (or by quadratic methods). But, we know that the minimum of ##f(c)## must be greater than or equal to zero. I'm hoping that tells us something about ##\langle x, y \rangle##.

Never forget the basics!
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
We have a quadratic in ##c## and can find the minimum by calculus (or by quadratic methods). But, we know that the minimum of ##f(c)## must be greater than or equal to zero. I'm hoping that tells us something about ##\langle x, y \rangle##.

Never forget the basics!
Yes, got that (post #9).
 
  • #13
Hall said:
$$
\frac{ 2 \langle x,y\rangle } {||y||^2}=0$$
$$
\langle x, y \rangle =0$$
I don't get this at all. How do you conclude that ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0##?
 
  • #14
PeroK said:
I don't get this at all. How do you conclude that ##\langle x, y \rangle = 0##?
@pasmith that said it has two two equal roots and one of them we know is zero, so, the other one must also be equal to zero.
 
  • #15
Hall said:
@pasmith that said it has two two equal roots and one of them we know is zero, so, the other one must also be equal to zero.
Hall said:
$$
\frac{ 2 \langle x,y\rangle } {||y||^2}=0$$
$$
\langle x, y \rangle =0$$
Okay, but I would have said that the other root is ##-\frac{ 2 \langle x,y\rangle } {||y||^2}##. And, if we need that root to be zero, then ##\langle x,y\rangle = 0##.
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
Okay, but I would have said that the other root is ##-\frac{ 2 \langle x,y\rangle } {||y||^2}##. And, if we need that root to be zero, then ##\langle x,y\rangle = 0##.
Quite the same logic of qudratics is used in this question:

It is given that ## \langle x, x \rangle =0 \iff x=0##. Prove that either ##\langle x,x \rangle \gt 0## or ##\langle x, x \rangle \lt 0## for all ##x \neq 0##.
 
  • #17
There is a different argument that gives the result rather quickly:

We have ##c^2 ||y||^2 + 2c\langle x,y\rangle \geq 0## for all ##c##. Assume that unless ##\langle x,y\rangle \neq 0##. For small enough ##c##, the first term in the inequality will be negligible compared to the second, which will therefore determine the sign of the LHS. However, as the sign of ##c## is arbitrary, we cannot have ##c\langle x,y\rangle \geq 0## for both positive and negative ##c##, leading to a contradiction. Hence, the assumption that ##\langle x,y\rangle \neq 0## is false and therefore ##\langle x,y\rangle = 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK

1. What does the notation "##\langle x, y \rangle##" mean in this statement?

The notation "##\langle x, y \rangle##" represents the dot product or inner product of two vectors x and y.

2. What does it mean for the dot product of two vectors to equal 0?

If the dot product of two vectors x and y is equal to 0, it means that the two vectors are perpendicular to each other. This can also be interpreted as the two vectors having no shared direction.

3. How is the dot product related to the lengths of the two vectors involved?

The dot product of two vectors x and y is equal to the product of their lengths multiplied by the cosine of the angle between them. This relationship can be represented as ##\langle x, y \rangle = ||x|| \cdot ||y|| \cdot \cos \theta##.

4. What does the statement "##||x + cy|| \geq ||x||##" mean in this context?

This statement means that the length of the vector x added to the length of the vector cy is greater than or equal to the length of the vector x alone. In other words, adding a multiple of y to x will result in a vector with a greater or equal length.

5. How can this statement be used to prove that "##\langle x, y \rangle = 0 \iff ||x + cy|| \geq ||x||##"?

By using the properties of the dot product and the lengths of vectors, it can be shown that if the dot product of x and y is equal to 0, then the length of x added to the length of cy will always be greater than or equal to the length of x alone. Similarly, if the length of x added to the length of cy is greater than or equal to the length of x, then the dot product of x and y must be equal to 0. Therefore, the two statements are equivalent.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
499
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
913
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
294
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
598
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
288
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
608
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
280
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
966
Back
Top