Proving that central force is conservative and getting the energy

In summary: You can choose the potential zero at infinity, integrate from ##\vec r_## to ∞.In summary, the student is trying to calculate potential energy and has three equations. They use the equation -\frac{a}{2r^{3}}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right) + C to get -\frac{a}{2r^{3}}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)+C. They calculate the curl of the potential energy and it is zero, so they are conservative in their calculations. They substitute f(r) and get \left( -\frac{ax
  • #1
aquance
28
0

Homework Statement


Hey, sorry in advance if something I write is unclear but I am not native English speaker.

I have a central force that is defined as [tex]F=-f(r) \frac{\vec{r}}{r}[/tex] where [tex]f(r)[/tex] is some function of distance and [tex]\vec{r}=(x,y,z)[/tex]. I have to calculate potential energy when [tex]f(r)=\frac{a}{r^{2}}[/tex] and I have to use [tex]\vec{r}d\vec{r}=\frac{dr^{2}}{2}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote Force F as [tex]\left( -\frac{f(r)x}{r}, -\frac{f(r)y}{r},-\frac{f(r)z}{r} \right)[/tex] can I or can I not do it?
Calculated the curl, it was 0 so it is conservative. Now I substituted f(r) and got [tex]\left( -\frac{ax}{r^{3}}, -\frac{ay}{r^{3}},-\frac{az}{r^{3}} \right)[/tex]

To calculate potential energy I have 3 equations:

[tex]-\frac{ax}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dx}[/tex]
[tex]-\frac{ay}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dy}[/tex]
[tex]-\frac{az}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dz}[/tex]

and the result is [tex]-\frac{a}{2r^{3}}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right) + C[/tex]. I didn't use the [tex]\vec{r}d\vec{r}=\frac{dr^{2}}{2}[/tex] so I guess I did something wrongWhen you reply please tell me where and why did I make a mistake and how to correct it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you missed negatives in your calculations when solving for E. (Since dE/dx = -Fx etc..)

Note also ##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2##.

Did you mean to write ##\vec r \cdot d\vec r = dr^2/2##?

Then $$U = - \int \vec F \cdot d\vec r = - \int \frac{f(r)}{r} \vec r \cdot d\vec r \dots$$
And $$\int \frac{dr^2}{r^3} \propto \frac{1}{r}.$$

So yes, your method is fine, but maybe they wanted you to use the approach above.
 
  • #3
Yes I forgot about the minuses, thanks for noticing that. Yes I meant what you wrote with the r*dr.

Thanks, I thought my method is incorrect :)
 
  • #4
The only mistake I can find is an extra factor of (1/2) in your final answer that shouldn't be there. It is possible to solve the problem the way you did (after fixing that mistake), but it is easier to solve it using the identity provided in the problem. Try it...
 
  • #5
Why is 1/2 a mistake?

When I have the [tex]-\frac{ax}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dx}[/tex] it turns into

[tex]-\frac{ax}{r^{3}}dx = dE [/tex]

[tex]-\int\frac{ax}{r^{3}}dx = \int dE[/tex]

[tex] E=-\frac{ax^{2}}{2r^{3}} + C[/tex]
 
  • #6
The integral is incorrect because r is a function of x. It cannot be treated as a constant. r2 = x2 = y2 = z2.
 
  • #7
but [tex] \vec{r} [/tex] is a function of x, [tex] r [/tex] is is simply a scalar ? I would have tried the method mentioned here but I have no idea how to even start to be honest ;p I've missed some lectures about how to solve integrals with vectors and such
 
  • #8
aquance said:
but [tex] \vec{r} [/tex] is a function of x, [tex] r [/tex] is is simply a scalar ? I would have tried the method mentioned here but I have no idea how to even start to be honest ;p I've missed some lectures about how to solve integrals with vectors and such

Missing lectures is a bad idea. r is indeed a scalar, but it is not a constant scalar. It is a function of x, y, and z. Try to change the variable of integration from x to r.
 
  • #9
Okay so I can see how r^2=x^2+y^2+z^2, but I don't know how to change the variable of integration, I can't just substitute sqrt(r^2-y^2-z^2) for x...
 
  • #10
aquance said:
Okay so I can see how r^2=x^2+y^2+z^2, but I don't know how to change the variable of integration, I can't just substitute sqrt(r^2-y^2-z^2) for x...

Yes you can. What do you get for dx?

Tip: It's easier if you use implicit differentiation.
 
  • #11
Okay, so
[tex] x=\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}} [/tex]

then

[tex] dx=\frac{r}{\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr[/tex]

to integral now

[tex] ax∫\frac{1}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr [/tex]

?
 
  • #12
You made the same mistake again. You pulled the x out of the integral. You can't do that because x is a function of r. Just substitute the expression for x provided at the top of your post.
 
  • #13
Ahaaa! Thanks :)

[tex] a∫\frac{x}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr =[/tex]

[tex] a∫\frac{\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr =[/tex]

[tex] -\frac{a}{r} + C [/tex]

So that would mean that [tex] E = -\frac{3a}{r}+ C [/tex]

Is it correct? Or should it be just [tex]-\frac{a}{r}+ C [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
it's just -a/r + C.
 
  • #15
You can choose the potential zero at infinity, integrate from ##\vec r_## to ∞.


[tex]V(\vec {r})=\int_{\vec r}^{∞}{\frac{a}{r'^3}\vec r' \cdot \vec{dr'}}[/tex]

You can write r'dr= 0.5 d(r2) and introduce the variable u=r2.

The integral becomes[tex] \int{0.5 \frac{a}{u^{3/2} }du}[/tex] What do you get?

Substitute back u=r2 and take the limits.ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #16
So it's [tex]-(0-\frac{a}{r}) = \frac{a}{r} [/tex] ? Why do we integrate from r1 to r2, and why do we take r2 as infinity?
 
  • #17
The potential difference is the integral of the negative force between two points, r1 and r2. If you choose r2 at infinity, where the potential is zero, you get the potential at r1.
I edited my post a bit.

ehild
 

What is a central force?

A central force is a type of force that acts on an object towards a fixed point or axis, known as the center of force. Examples include gravitation and electrostatic forces.

What does it mean for a central force to be conservative?

A conservative force is one in which the work done by the force is independent of the path taken by the object. In other words, the total energy of the system remains constant regardless of the path the object takes.

How is the energy of a system related to a central force?

In a conservative central force, the total mechanical energy of the system is conserved. This means that the sum of the kinetic energy and potential energy of the object remains constant throughout its motion.

What is the proof that a central force is conservative?

The proof for a central force being conservative involves showing that the work done by the force is path-independent. This can be done using mathematical equations and principles such as the work-energy theorem and the divergence theorem.

Why is it important to prove that a central force is conservative?

Proving that a central force is conservative is important because it allows us to use conservation of energy principles to analyze the motion of objects under the influence of that force. This simplifies calculations and provides a better understanding of the dynamics of the system.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
408
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
229
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
274
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
906
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
362
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
234
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
482
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
212
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top