QCD & Weak Theory: Furry's Theorem & Beyond

In summary: It's actually a bit more interesting than I initially thought, so I might compute the full thing (ghosts and gluons) for the three point. If I find anything interesting I'll post back!
  • #1
izh-21251
34
1
Hello, everyone!

I have a short question. I think everybody knows the Furry theorem for QED, which tells, in particular, that fermion loops with odd number of fermions always give 0.

Does the same true for QCD of weak theory? Can one have non-zero contribution to 3-gluon vertex (or 3-boson vertex) from 3-quark (3-lepton) loop with strong (weak) vertices.

Thanks,
Ivan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"QCD of weak theory"? I guess that should be an "or".

Gluon fusion to produce a Higgs is an example of strong plus weak interaction with a 3-vertex fermion loop (top is dominating).
 
  • #3
mfb said:
"QCD of weak theory"? I guess that should be an "or".

Gluon fusion to produce a Higgs is an example of strong plus weak interaction with a 3-vertex fermion loop (top is dominating).

Yes but that process has two vector currents and a scalar current, so the total expression is even under charge conjugation. A three gluon loop would contribute a ##C## odd combination of vector currents.

The same logic for Furry's theorem in QED works for Yang-Mills theory. Diagrams with an odd number of (only) gluon external legs connected directly to internal fermion lines will vanish. Your point is well taken that you restrict to the class of diagrams that are nonzero because of scalar and gluon self-interaction vertices.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and izh-21251
  • #4
I need to check on paper. But it's the same with the exception that we get a trace of ( ta tb tc) , and the other diagram with a minus sign is (ta tc tb). So I think the symmetric colour structure d_abc piece vanishes and the f_abc piece is left over.
 
  • #5
RGevo said:
I need to check on paper. But it's the same with the exception that we get a trace of ( ta tb tc) , and the other diagram with a minus sign is (ta tc tb). So I think the symmetric colour structure d_abc piece vanishes and the f_abc piece is left over.

If you setup the calculation for the 3 external gluons coming out of a fermion triangle there are really two diagrams with the loop momenta running in opposite directions. Because of the color labels we need to consider both of them. Since the fermion propagators are linear in momenta, you'll find the amplitudes come in with the opposite sign. So the sum of the two graphs actually vanishes.
 
  • #6
fzero said:
If you setup the calculation for the 3 external gluons coming out of a fermion triangle there are really two diagrams with the loop momenta running in opposite directions. Because of the color labels we need to consider both of them. Since the fermion propagators are linear in momenta, you'll find the amplitudes come in with the opposite sign. So the sum of the two graphs actually vanishes.
Hi fzero,

So are you saying what I wrote is wrong?

In one diagram I should get Tr{ tA tB tC}, while in the other I get Tr{ tA tC tB}.

So for the first I get 1/4( i fABC + dABD) and in the second I get 1/4( -i fABC + dABD ). Therefore, when I sum up the two diagrams (which have opposite sign like i said in the first place), I get something proportional to 1/2 i fABC. I guess something like this is expected, since in colour structure (if these were very massive fermions which were integrated out as in an effective interaction) this would lead to something like the three gluon vertex.

Anyway, in QCD its of course never as straightforward, since for the three point function it is also necessary to include gluons and ghosts in the loops. There are also extra topologies compared to QED where there are 4-gluon vertices. [Edit: I notice fzero already wrote about this above]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
RGevo said:
Hi fzero,

So are you saying what I wrote is wrong?

You are correct. After setting the calculation up I find the same factors that you do. My post about the calculation using currents is also incorrect, since the color index on the fermions prevents the current from being an eigenstate of charge conjugation. Thank you for following up on this.
 
  • #8
No problem. I was just a little confused as to whether I'd done something stupid.

It's actually a bit more interesting than I initially thought, so I might compute the full thing (ghosts and gluons) for the three point. If I find anything interesting I'll post back!
 

1. What is QCD?

QCD stands for Quantum Chromodynamics, and it is a theory that explains the strong interaction between quarks and gluons, the fundamental particles that make up protons and neutrons. It is a fundamental theory in the Standard Model of particle physics.

2. What is the Weak Theory?

The Weak Theory, also known as the Electroweak Theory, is a theory that describes the unified electromagnetic and weak interactions. It explains how particles interact through the exchange of W and Z bosons, and it is also a part of the Standard Model.

3. What is Furry's Theorem?

Furry's Theorem, named after physicist Wendell Furry, is a theorem in quantum field theory that states that the parity (or mirror symmetry) of a system is conserved if the Hamiltonian (the operator that describes the total energy of a system) is invariant under a certain transformation. In simple terms, it means that certain symmetries in a system are preserved.

4. What is Beyond the Standard Model?

Beyond the Standard Model refers to theories and phenomena that cannot be explained by the Standard Model. These may include dark matter, the hierarchy problem, and the unification of all fundamental forces. QCD and the Weak Theory are both a part of the Standard Model, but there are still many unanswered questions and potential discoveries that lie beyond it.

5. How do QCD and the Weak Theory relate to each other?

QCD and the Weak Theory are two separate theories, but they are both a part of the Standard Model and are closely related. The Weak Theory describes the unified electromagnetic and weak interactions, while QCD describes the strong interaction. Both theories are necessary to fully understand the behavior of fundamental particles and their interactions.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
976
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
517
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
909
Back
Top