- #1
smodak
- 459
- 253
A little about my background. I have a undergraduate degree in physics which I obtained exactly 20 years back. I also have a undergraduate degree in EE which I obtained about 17 years back. I have worked as a software engineer all my life and currently also pursuing my MBA in Finance. Needless to say that I am a bit rusty in Physics and math but I have always been interested in Physics and recently started reading Physics again after I read (and enjoyed) the theoretical minimum book by Susskind.
I started reading The Road to Reality and so far like it very much. In introducing the contour integration on a complex plane, he mentions a few things that I do not understand.
1. In Chapter 7, page 124 he says (citing a definite integral of a real function between a and b)
But for a complex plane
Question: Why do we have only one path in a real plane but more than one on a complex plane?
2. He says that he will introduce C-R equations in chapter 12 but he then says that the C-R equations tell us that
Question: I do not understand this statement
Could you help? Please be gentle :)
Is there a book on complex analysis (not too thick) that will help me understand Chapter 7 (or later chapters) in Penrose?
I started reading The Road to Reality and so far like it very much. In introducing the contour integration on a complex plane, he mentions a few things that I do not understand.
1. In Chapter 7, page 124 he says (citing a definite integral of a real function between a and b)
There is only one way to go from a to b along the real line
But for a complex plane
We do not just have one route from a to b
Question: Why do we have only one path in a real plane but more than one on a complex plane?
2. He says that he will introduce C-R equations in chapter 12 but he then says that the C-R equations tell us that
If we do our integration along one such path then we get the same answer as along any other such path that can be obtained from the first by continuous deformation within the domain of the function.
Question: I do not understand this statement
Could you help? Please be gentle :)
Is there a book on complex analysis (not too thick) that will help me understand Chapter 7 (or later chapters) in Penrose?