Sending a rocket into space 75% less fuel.

In summary, the individual proposes a concept for a space launch system similar to the hadron collider. The system would involve a tube underground with high powered magnets that would propel the space shuttle forward, allowing it to reach high speeds and eventually launch into space with less fuel. While the idea may seem far-fetched, the individual believes it could be feasible.
  • #1
uperkurk
167
0
So I have been thinking and there's probably a good reason why it doesn't exist already but i'll go ahead and share my idea here on the forums. How about making something similar to the hadron collider but the tube that runs underground is capable of housing the space shuttle. It sits on rail tracks and inside the tunnel are high power magnetics that repell each other in a V shape. So imagine like this.


When the space shuttle passes through the magnets it gets a boost because the magnetics push the shuttle in a forwards direction. The magnetics form a solid uninteruppted forwards push and the space shuttle has no option but to gain speed.

It goes round in a huge circle on rails constantly gaining speed. Once it reaches say 10,000mph the track changes and it goes in a straight line and very slowly the track bends upwards until it's vertical, then when it reaches the exit point it's traveling at 10,000mph and heading right for the stars :)

Then as soon as it leaves the exit point it's engines ignite and we go to the moon for 75% less fuel.


It sounds like a really dreamy idea but as it stands I don't see why it wouldn't work.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org

1. How is it possible to send a rocket into space with 75% less fuel?

This is possible through the use of advanced propulsion systems, such as ion thrusters or nuclear propulsion, which are more efficient than traditional chemical rockets.

2. Will the rocket still be able to travel the same distance with less fuel?

Yes, with the use of more efficient propulsion systems, the rocket can still travel the same distance as traditional rockets with less fuel. This is because these systems are able to generate more thrust with less fuel.

3. What are the benefits of using 75% less fuel for space travel?

There are several benefits, including reduced launch costs, increased payload capacity, and the potential for longer space missions. It also has a positive impact on the environment by reducing the amount of pollutants released into the atmosphere.

4. Are there any risks associated with using less fuel for space travel?

As with any new technology, there are some risks involved. However, extensive testing and research is conducted before implementing these propulsion systems for space travel. Additionally, these systems have been used successfully in unmanned spacecraft for decades.

5. How does this impact the future of space exploration?

This advancement in propulsion technology opens up new possibilities for space exploration, allowing for longer missions and potentially even manned missions to distant planets. It also has the potential to make space travel more accessible and cost-effective for future missions.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top