Sketching the Spectrum of the Signal x(t)

In summary, the spectrum of the signal defined by x(t) = \sum_{k = -3}^{3}\frac{1}{1+j\pi k}e^{j4\pi kt} can be represented using polar notation for the phasors and the frequency axis in Hz. The amplitude for each of the corresponding k values is given by the general form \frac{1}{\sqrt{(k\pi)^2 + 1}}. The frequencies are located at -6, -4, -2, 0, 2, 4, and 6 Hz. When converting to polar form, it is important to remember that arc tan(-πk) is not the same as arc tan(π
  • #1
freezer
76
0

Homework Statement


Make a sketch of the spectrum of the signal defined by:

[itex] x(t) = \sum_{k = -3}^{3}\frac{1}{1+j\pi k}e^{j4\pi kt} [/itex]

Use polar notation for the phasors on the plot, and sketch the frequency axis in Hz.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]a_{k} = \frac{1}{1 + j\pi k}[/itex]

[itex]a_{-k}^{*} = a_k[/itex]

[itex]a_1 = \frac{1}{1+j\pi} [/itex]

[itex]a_2 = \frac{1}{1+j2\pi} [/itex]

[itex]a_3 = \frac{1}{1+j3\pi} [/itex]

Convert them to polar, I get the general form:

[itex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{(k\pi)^2 + 1}}e^{-j arctan(k\pi)} [/itex]


My frequency stems will be at -6, -4, -2, 0, 2, 4, 6 with the above amplitude for each of the corresponding k values.

Can you double check my work, the arctan is makeing me question my results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This all looks good. The frequencies are +/- 0, 2, 4 and 6 Hz as you post.
Did you remember a0/SUB] = 1?

If all you're supposed to do is plot the magnitude spectrum, you'd be done.

The exp(-jtan-1kπ) term is the phase expression. I.e. phase = tan-1(kπ) and you could plot that vs. the 7 frequency spots as well.
 
  • #3
Thank you for checking my work. I was concerned about the arctan, i had not come across that before.

the other way i was thinking if we look at k=+/-1

[itex]\frac{1}{1+j\pi}e^{j\pi t} + \frac{1}{1-j\pi}e^{-j\pi t}[/itex]

Getting a common denominator

[itex]\frac{2}{1+ \pi^2}e^{j\pi t} + \frac{2}{1+\pi^2}e^{-j\pi t} [/itex]

for k=+/-2

[itex]\frac{2}{1+4 \pi^2}e^{j4\pi t} + \frac{2}{1+4\pi^2}e^{-j4\pi t}[/itex]

and for k = +/-3

[itex] \frac{2}{1+9 \pi^2}e^{j12\pi t} + \frac{2}{1+9\pi^2}e^{-j12\pi t} [/itex]

and yes, i did forget to mention k=0 if 0 with mag of 1.
 
  • #4
freezer said:
Thank you for checking my work. I was concerned about the arctan, i had not come across that before.

You will, many times I'm sure.

Reason: a + jb = √(a2 + b2) exp[ tan-1(b/a)]
in other words, this is how you change from cartesian to polar & back.
the other way i was thinking if we look at k=+/-1

[itex]\frac{1}{1+j\pi}e^{j\pi t} + \frac{1}{1-j\pi}e^{-j\pi t}[/itex]

Getting a common denominator

[itex]\frac{2}{1+ \pi^2}e^{j\pi t} + \frac{2}{1+\pi^2}e^{-j\pi t} [/itex]

The second line does not follow from the first. Following what I wrote above,

1/(1 + jπk) = 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp[j tan-1(-πk)]

so 1/(1 + jπk) exp(j4πkt) = 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp[j tan-1(-πk)] exp(j4πkt)

= 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp j[4πkt + tan-1(-πk)].

When you do any arc tan function, remember arc tan(-b/a) is not the same angle as arc tan(b/-a)
so don't leave the expression as exp[-j arc tan(πk)] as you did in your post #1. It should be exp[j arc tan(-πk)].

As I said, arc tan(-πk) is the phase angle, and arc tan(-πk/1) and arc tan(πk/-1) are 180 degrees apart!
 
  • #5
rude man said:
You will, many times I'm sure.

CORRECTION:
Reason: a + jb = √(a2 + b2) exp[j tan-1(b/a)]
in other words, this is how you change from cartesian to polar & back.


The second line does not follow from the first. Following what I wrote above,

1/(1 + jπk) = 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp[j tan-1(-πk)]

so 1/(1 + jπk) exp(j4πkt) = 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp[j tan-1(-πk)] exp(j4πkt)

= 1/√[1 + (πk)2] exp j[4πkt + tan-1(-πk)].

When you do any arc tan function, remember arc tan(-b/a) is not the same angle as arc tan(b/-a)
so don't leave the expression as exp[-j arc tan(πk)] as you did in your post #1. It should be exp[j arc tan(-πk)].

As I said, arc tan(-πk) is the phase angle, and arc tan(-πk/1) and arc tan(πk/-1) are 180 degrees apart!

See correction above.
 

1. What does it mean to verify the spectrum of a signal?

Verifying the spectrum of a signal refers to analyzing the frequency components present in the signal and ensuring that they match the expected or desired spectrum. This is important for validating the accuracy and quality of the signal.

2. How is the spectrum of a signal measured?

The spectrum of a signal is measured using a device called a spectrum analyzer. This instrument measures the amplitude of different frequency components in the signal and displays them in a graphical format.

3. Why is verifying the spectrum of a signal important?

Verifying the spectrum of a signal is important for several reasons. It allows for the detection of any unexpected or unwanted frequency components that may interfere with the signal. It also helps in troubleshooting and quality control of the signal.

4. What are some common techniques used to verify the spectrum of a signal?

Some common techniques used to verify the spectrum of a signal include Fourier analysis, which breaks down the signal into its individual frequency components, and spectral density estimation, which estimates the power spectral density of the signal.

5. Can the spectrum of a signal change over time?

Yes, the spectrum of a signal can change over time. This is known as spectral dynamics and can be caused by various factors such as environmental conditions, interference, or intentional changes made to the signal.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
991
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
767
Back
Top