SR Doppler Effect: Differences in Wave VS Momentum Models

In summary: If you think I sound churlish or truculent, I can assure you that that's not my intention, though I may sometimes inadvertently come across as so.I don't think you sound churlish or truculent. I think you are providing a summary of the content.
  • #36
tade said:
...model uses spherical Doppler wavefronts, why is this model inaccurate?

I don't know if its relevant to your problem but spherical wavefronts are impossible. To see why imagine the E or B vectors on a sphere. The Euler characteristic of a sphere is 2. Roughly the Euler characteristic can be seen to represent the minimum number of places where the wind speed must be zero. So if you imagine wind blowing on a sphere you will always have at least two places where the wind does not blow. On a torus you can have zero as the wind can blow up through the center around down and back in and up. The Euler characteristic is 0 for a Torus. So that means the curl of any vector field on a sphere must be 0 in at least two places. The E and B fields therefore must be zero. in fact this is true and all so called omni antennas have nulls.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Justintruth said:
I don't know if its relevant to your problem but spherical wavefronts are impossible. To see why imagine the E or B vectors on a sphere. The Euler characteristic of a sphere is 2. Roughly the Euler characteristic can be seen to represent the minimum number of places where the wind speed must be zero. So if you imagine wind blowing on a sphere you will always have at least two places where the wind does not blow. On a torus you can have zero as the wind can blow up through the center around down and back in and up. The Euler characteristic is 0 for a Torus. So that means the curl of any vector field on a sphere must be 0 in at least two places. The E and B fields therefore must be zero. in fact this is true and all so called omni antennas have nulls.
I see, but I don't think it is that relevant.

What I said in #35, is it correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
71
Views
6K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
876
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
921
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top