- #36
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 10,877
- 422
The second movie was offensive to vulcanologists. The first one was offensive to people who study Vulcans.
Fredrik said:... (You haven't seen any of the Pegg/Frost comedies?) ... Benedict Cumberbatch has become a pretty big name recently, because of the success of Sherlock.
AnTiFreeze3 said:...
On topic, I'm visiting my uncle this upcoming weekend, and he's a huge Star Trek fan, although I have no idea of his opinion on these newer movies. ...
greg bernhardt said:just got back from seeing it! Definitely lots of fun and some nice plot twists. It was fairly long, but it almost felt short. There was a lot they could have further developed.
Ryan_m_b said:Flex I took it that they weren't in orbit in the first place, rather in typical SF fashion they were hovering with antigravity or some such. Either way though you're right in pointing out that science isn't rigorous here, that's not typically a bad thing as long as it's entertaining but it can make it shallow.
FlexGunship said:I've recently had this discussion with a friend, and this is my only argument to "antigravity" (setting aside the physics of actual antigravity):
Assume they arrived about 500km from the surface of the moon. Add in the radius of the moon (~1700km), assume a mass of 7*10^22kg and solve for orbital velocity. I get about ~1.5km/s give or take a couple hundred m/s. Calculate the force of acceleration due to gravity at that distance and you get about 1m/s. After 25 minutes (25*60=1500) it doesn't make sense to point your antigrav stuff down... you should've been pointing it tangential and gone into orbit. I mean, it doesn't take more than 45 seconds to run through that calculation.
Furthermore, when they lost power... why are they falling towards Earth? Earth's pull is three orders of magnitude smaller at that distance. It's not even a competition! Moon wins!
It's as though they define the entire universe in terms of "some altitude above San Francisco."
OmCheeto said:Pfft!
Just pretend, in the future, that they edited out the real physics empty time, where Kirk and the crew played charades, or pictionary, or are watching "Fast and Furious 893", or something.
Julio R said:Ha! Priceless comment! :D
dkotschessaa said:Finally watched. My wife actually went along, because she likes sherlock/eggs benedict cumberbuns or whatever his name is.
I just had to shut off the voices in my head going "huh?" and go along with the ride and pretend it was something completely other than Star trek (Except when I had to explain stuff to my wife).
Then we watched Iron man III in the same theatre. I have the best wife ever.
-Dave K
DiracPool said:Oh, yeah, Saw it last weekend at the Regal RPX in 3D, that's Regal's version of IMAX.
I have a one word review for the movie (don't worry, it's not a spoiler):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajsNJtnUb7c
Cry Havoc! And, and let slip the dogs of war...
OmCheeto said:You do realize of course, that everyone at the forum, wants to kill you, and marry your wife.
:grumpy:
DiracPool said:Oh, yeah, Saw it last weekend at the Regal RPX in 3D, that's Regal's version of IMAX.
I have a one word review for the movie (don't worry, it's not a spoiler):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajsNJtnUb7c
Janus said:Okay, how many noticed this in the scene where Kirk meets with Admiral Marcus:
There is a line up of models on a table/counter. Starting with a Wright biplane working its way up through a Saturn V and space shuttle and beyond.
It included:
1. The Phoenix (Cochrane's warp ship from "First Contact")
2. The ship that is the second from the right in this shot from STTMP, which shows ships that were named "Enterprise".
3. The Enterprise (NX-01) from the series "Enterprise".
4. The Kelvin (Star Trek 2009)
5. The Enterprise (NCC-1701)
Mordred said:good movie, loved some of the scenes, still prefer Khan from the motion picture. He knew how to stress his superiority lol.
the one part I laughed at was when Khan teleported from Earth to some planet in Klingon space in the neutral zone? If they could teleport that far why do they need starships lol.
in the original series the neutral zone resulted from battling the klingons during the 5 year mission. For that matter that was when khan was first introduced was during the 5 year mission.
In the movie the neutral zone was already in place.
still a good movie but easy to nit pick apart lol
still a good movie but easy to nit pick apart lol
Cry Havoc! And, and let slip the dogs of war...
Here's the only explanation that I can come with. This ability is only due to Mr. Scott's trans-warp beaming equations. Originally, he did not come up we these equations until much later. The only reason they have them now is that "future Spock" was aware of them. I assume that Scott developed these equations some time after the TNG episode "Relics".Mordred said:good movie, loved some of the scenes, still prefer Khan from the motion picture. He knew how to stress his superiority lol.
the one part I laughed at was when Khan teleported from Earth to some planet in Klingon space in the neutral zone? If they could teleport that far why do they need starships lol.
There never was a Klingon/Federation neutral zone in the original series. the Neutral zone was between the Federation and the Romulans. The Federation and Klingons had a "disputed area" established by the Organian Peace Treaty. In the Treaty, both parties could travel in that area freely, but to claim a planet in it they had to show that they develop it the best. (An example was the dispute over Sherman's planet.in the original series the neutral zone resulted from battling the klingons during the 5 year mission. For that matter that was when khan was first introduced was during the 5 year mission.
In the movie the neutral zone was already in place.
The whole idea of a Klingon neutral zone was introduced in "The Wrath of Khan" with the Kobyashi Maru test. My guess is that the original script was to use the Romulan Neutral Zone, but the studio, decided that since they already had stock footage of Klingon ships from the First movie, they could save money by replacing Romulan with Klingon in the script. One give away is when it is stated that "Klingons don't take prisoners". This was not something established for Klingons, but was established for the Romulans.
still a good movie but easy to nit pick apart lol
dkotschessaa said:On a related note, giving DS9 another go today on Netflix...
It goes with the territory. Star Trek translates best as a TV series; that's where its "identity" shines. There you can do an episode like "Data's Day", which is not something a movie audience would sit through. And to be quite frank, I don't think any movie could truly capture the "identity" of Star Trek, because so many people identify with Star trek in so many different way,HayleySarg said:I could type out a novel about how I truly feel, details and all. What it comes down to, is:
This was a great movie, but in my eyes, not the best Trek movie. I feel that for the sake of making a $$$ film, they gave away a little too much of the true identity of Star Trek.
Trans-warp was sort of a deus ex machina. Oh hey this bad guy needs to get far away, fast, so let's uh, yeah, portable transwarp. Ugh. But hey, good movie or what it's worth.
Janus said:Here's the only explanation that I can come with. This ability is only due to Mr. Scott's trans-warp beaming equations. Originally, he did not come up we these equations until much later. The only reason they have them now is that "future Spock" was aware of them. I assume that Scott developed these equations some time after the TNG episode "Relics".
The Starfleet of the new time line has classified this knowledge. Khan was able to steal or fabricate a working unit. It could even be that the ability to transport that far a distance was a modification that Khan made himself.
I assume that trans-warp beaming only works if you already have coordinates for your destination. You would still need ships to explore and plot out unexplored regions.
There never was a Klingon/Federation neutral zone in the original series. the Neutral zone was between the Federation and the Romulans. The Federation and Klingons had a "disputed area" established by the Organian Peace Treaty. In the Treaty, both parties could travel in that area freely, but to claim a planet in it they had to show that they develop it the best. (An example was the dispute over Sherman's planet.
Just about any movie can be nit picked apart.
dkotschessaa said:Has anyone seen the "honest trailer" for the previous movie?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTfBH-XFdSc