Thermo - Simple Energy balance equation

In summary: The equations for closed systems are Q-W = ΔE and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE, while the equations for open systems are ΔE = -m[h2 - h1 + (V2-V1)^2/2 + g(z2-z1)] + Q-Ws and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE. The difference between the two versions is that the closed system version does not account for mass entering or leaving the system, while the open system version does.
  • #1
ksukhin
34
1
The General Energy balance equation is:
∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est (in rate form - don't know how to put the dot above)

I know that Est is 0 when the system operates at Steady State Steady Flow (SSSF).

I have 2 formulas for ΔE in "Q-W = ΔE"
1) ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE
2) ΔE = m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]
How do I know which one to use in which scenario?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
  1. ksukhin said:
    ∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est
    Dude! There wouldn't be any ## E_(gen) ## term in the energy equation. Energy cannot be created neither can it be destroyed. Though many textbooks write this term but this is not a good habit to follow. It destroys the whole beauty of energy conservation equation. What you interpret as ## E_(gen) ## is actually the energy transformation from one form to other across the system boundary. For example suppose you have an electric heater of 1000 Watt. Instead of interpreting as 1000 J of energy being produced per second, you can interpret it as 1000 Joule of electric energy (from out of the system) coming inside the system and getting converted into heat energy, per second.
  2. For your concern of which equation to use, I will suggest you to stop plugging equations in problems. Rather sit back and think about all the energy interactions going on for 1-2 minutes before actually starting the solution. The only reason, you see so many energy equations is because there are situations when one form of energy is negligible in comparison to others and hence are neglected. For example is the ( ## v^2 ## ) term is very small as compared to the enthalpy terms ( ## h ## ), you can neglect the kinetic energy. You will know this once you choose your system and analyse it. Once you have identified, all the energies being involved, go for the energy conservation law. All you need to remember is that you cannot create energy out of nothing and that you cannot destroy it either.
    So the equation I prefer is $$ ∑E_(in) = ΣE_(out) + Δe $$ where ## E_(in) ## involves all the energy coming inside the system in form of external work, heat input, enthalpy, kinetic energy of incoming fluid etc and similarly ## E_(out) ## will include every outgoing energy. Further ## Δe = e_(final)-e_(initial) ## where ## e ## includes every energy associated with the substance inside the boundary. If you wish to write this in terms of rates, simply differentiate. The differentiation will be rather easy for a specific problem. I mean suppose I consider the enthalpy term, ## H = m* h## , where ## h ## is the specific enthalpy, so in rate form this will simply be mass flow rate multiplied by specific enthalpy.
See in nutshell, all you need to do is know the energy transformations and trust the energy conservation law. Trust me, once you know how to use the energy conservation law properly, these equations will never bother you. You will get used to write your own equation for every case.

I have tried my best to be clear at what I am trying to convey, if there is something I have missed or something I am not clear at, please let me know.
 
  • Like
Likes ksukhin
  • #3
Thanks for the quick reply!
I was a bit in shock since I have 8 finals in a span of 6 days so I blanked for a minute. I realized what I was doing wrong why i didn't get the equation.

I wasn't accounting for the work done by the fluid ##pv## and since ##h=u+pv## both equations are valid but they're case specific.

I was jumping from an Otto cycle which had QH=u2-u1 and a power plant where they use enthalphy. I just couldn't see that there was a ##pv## term not included because it wasn't needed.

Thanks again. I"m just a bit all over the place cause I'm freaking out
 
  • #4
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes ksukhin
  • #5
Vatsal Sanjay said:
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.

Yup I see the difference now, thanks again! I'll do my best not to panic tomorrow haha
 
  • Like
Likes Vatsal Sanjay
  • #6
In post #1,

The equations Q-W = ΔE and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to a closed system (no mass entering or leaving)

The equations ΔE =-m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]+Q-Ws and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to an open system (where mass can be entering and leaving). In this equation, Ws is the shaft work.

Chet
 
Last edited:

1. What is the simple energy balance equation?

The simple energy balance equation is a fundamental equation in thermodynamics that states that the change in internal energy of a system is equal to the heat added to the system minus the work done by the system.

2. Why is the simple energy balance equation important?

The simple energy balance equation is important because it allows us to understand and calculate the changes in energy within a system. This is crucial in many fields, including chemistry, physics, and engineering.

3. How is the simple energy balance equation used in real-world applications?

The simple energy balance equation is used in various real-world applications, such as calculating the energy efficiency of a building, predicting the temperature change in a chemical reaction, and analyzing the performance of engines and turbines.

4. What are the key components of the simple energy balance equation?

The key components of the simple energy balance equation are heat, work, and internal energy. Heat is the transfer of thermal energy between two systems, work is the transfer of energy due to a force acting over a distance, and internal energy is the total energy of a system.

5. How does the simple energy balance equation relate to the first and second laws of thermodynamics?

The simple energy balance equation is derived from the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The first law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted, while the second law states that the total entropy of a closed system will always increase over time. The simple energy balance equation takes into account both of these laws in its calculation of energy changes.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
890
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top