I Two-dimensional negative curvature space

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaime Rudas
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A two-dimensional space can indeed have constant negative curvature, but it cannot be smoothly isometrically embedded in Euclidean 3-space. The discussion references the FLRW metric, which illustrates how the curvature can be expressed mathematically. The Kretschmann scalar is used to demonstrate that curvature can be constant, whether positive, negative, or zero, based on the choice of the parameter k. This confirms the theoretical possibility of constructing a two-dimensional surface with uniform negative curvature. The exploration of these concepts highlights the complexities of geometric properties in different dimensional spaces.
Jaime Rudas
Messages
295
Reaction score
129
TL;DR Summary
Can a two-dimensional space have constant negative curvature?
In this PF Insight says:

(...) if you want a two-dimensional space to be homogeneous and isotropic, there are only three possibilities that fit the bill: space can be uniformly flat, it can have uniform positive curvature, or it can have uniform negative curvature.

Can a two-dimensional space really have constant negative curvature? That is, can a two-dimensional surface with uniform negative curvature be constructed?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Jaime Rudas said:
TL;DR Summary: Can a two-dimensional space have constant negative curvature?

In this PF Insight says:



Can a two-dimensional space really have constant negative curvature? That is, can a two-dimensional surface with uniform negative curvature be constructed?
Yes, but it can’t be smoothly isometrically embedded in Euclidean 3 space.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Ibix, PeroK, Orodruin and 1 other person
You can read it off from the FLRW metric with ##dt=d\theta=0##: $$ds^2=\frac{1}{1-kr^2}dr^2+r^2d\phi^2$$Run that through the usual machinery and you get the Kretschmann scalar ##R_{ijkl}R^{ijkl}=2k##, which is obviously everywhere constant positive, negative or zero depending on your choice of ##k##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes PAllen, Jaime Rudas and PeroK
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Back
Top