Unraveling the Mystery of Dark Matter: The Missing 96% of the Universe

In summary, the conversation discusses the mystery of dark matter and its role in the universe. Only about 4 percent of the universe is made up of visible matter, and various measures indicate that most of the universe is invisible. Cosmologists and particle physicists are working together to find the missing matter, with leading candidates being neutrinos, neutralinos, and axions. However, there is currently no consensus on what dark matter is. The conversation also mentions the idea of strangelets as a potential candidate, but there is no serious consensus on this. Additionally, the question is raised about why we do not see the effects of dark matter within individual star systems, and the answer is that on that scale, the density of dark matter is too small
  • #1
Johnsmith123
All the ordinary matter we can find accounts for only about 4 percent of the universe. We know this by calculating how much mass would be needed to hold galaxies together and cause them to move about the way they do when they gather in large clusters. Another way to weigh the unseen matter is to look at how gravity bends the light from distant objects. Every measure tells astronomers that most of the universe is invisible.

It's tempting to say that the universe must be full of dark clouds of dust or dead stars and be done with it, but there are persuasive arguments that this is not the case. First, although there are ways to spot even the darkest forms of matter, almost every attempt to find missing clouds and stars has failed. Second, and more convincing, cosmologists can make very precise calculations of the nuclear reactions that occurred right after the Big Bang and compare the expected results with the actual composition of the universe. Those calculations show that the total amount of ordinary matter, composed of familiar protons and neutrons, is much less than the total mass of the universe. Whatever the rest is, it isn't like the stuff of which we're made.

The quest to find the missing universe is one of the key efforts that has brought cosmologists and particle physicists together. The leading dark-matter candidates are neutrinos or two other kinds of particles: neutralinos and axions, predicted by some physics theories but never detected. All three of these particles are thought to be electrically neutral, thus unable to absorb or reflect light, yet stable enough to have survived from the earliest moments after the Big Bang.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, @Johnsmith123, and welcome to PhysicsForums!
With all respect, what is the purpose of your post? I do not see any specific question posted. If the question is merely "What is dark matter?" the answer is "we do not yet know". The question of dark matter is one the greatest scientific mysteries of today.
 
  • #3
This serves as a nice little introduction to dark matter, but some mentor has to move it to the cosmology forum I think.
 
  • #4
DennisN said:
what is the purpose of your post?

The post was plagiarized from http://discovermagazine.com/2002/feb/cover magazine.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
The post was plagiarized from http://discovermagazine.com/2002/feb/cover magazine.
When I read it first, it sounded like it came from somewhere else, but I assumed good faith.
 
  • #7
The short answer is dark matter is the stuff that gravitates without emitting any EM radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart and Delta2
  • #8
Any serious consensus on strangelets as a candidate for dark matter? I've also heard on some recent pop-sci shows that magnetism may explain the stellar and galactic behavior for which dark matter was invented, any real science behind this claim?
 
  • #9
stoomart said:
Any serious consensus on strangelets as a candidate for dark matter?

No.

stoomart said:
I've also heard on some recent pop-sci shows

Which are not valid sources here on PF.
 
  • #10
While we're on the subject, I have a question: I understand dark matter is invoked to explain the observed orbital dynamics of stars within galaxies. Why do we not see its effects within individual star systems? IOW, why isn't the Sun's gravitational attraction higher that we would expect given the amount of observed ordinary matter? If the answer is that dark matter is diffuse, why would that be if it only interacts gravitationally? It seems that dark matter would collect everywhere there is a significant accumulation of ordinary matter.
 
  • #11
sandy stone said:
Why do we not see its effects within individual star systems?

Because on the scale of an individual star system, the density of dark matter is too small to affect the dynamics significantly.

sandy stone said:
It seems that dark matter would collect everywhere there is a significant accumulation of ordinary matter.

No, it won't. Ordinary matter clumps much more effectively than dark matter does, because ordinary matter can lose energy by emitting EM radiation, which causes it to form tightly bound systems like stars and planets and star systems. Dark matter can only interact gravitationally, and the only gravitational interaction that can cause an isolated system to lose energy and become more tightly bound is the emission of gravitational radiation, which is extremely weak compared to the EM radiation emitted by ordinary matter as it clumps.
 
  • #12
Well, I hadn't considered that. Fascinating, thank you. .
 

1. What is dark matter?

Dark matter is a type of matter that does not interact with light, making it invisible to telescopes and other instruments. It is thought to make up about 27% of the universe, and is responsible for the gravitational effects observed in galaxies and the large-scale structure of the universe.

2. How do we know dark matter exists?

Scientists have observed the gravitational effects of dark matter on visible matter, such as stars and galaxies. They have also studied the rotation of galaxies and the bending of light from distant objects, both of which provide evidence for the existence of dark matter. Additionally, experiments using particle accelerators have also provided evidence for the existence of dark matter particles.

3. What is the difference between dark matter and normal matter?

Dark matter is fundamentally different from normal matter in that it does not interact with light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It also does not emit or absorb any known particles, making it very difficult to detect. Normal matter, on the other hand, interacts with light and other particles, and is responsible for the visible structures in the universe.

4. How is dark matter being studied and researched?

Dark matter is being studied through a variety of methods, including observations of its gravitational effects, simulations of the formation and evolution of the universe, and experiments aiming to directly detect dark matter particles. Scientists are also continually developing new theories and models to better understand the nature of dark matter and its role in the universe.

5. What implications does dark matter have for our understanding of the universe?

The existence of dark matter has significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It helps to explain the observed structure and dynamics of galaxies and the large-scale structure of the universe. It also plays a crucial role in the formation and evolution of the universe. Further research into dark matter could also lead to a better understanding of the fundamental laws of physics and the nature of the universe as a whole.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
958
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top