Using substitution to turn a series into a power series.

In summary: It's a bad habit that is reinforced by some sloppy notation. When you write ##\sqrt{x^2} = \pm x## you are saying that you are thinking about the solutions of the equation ##y^2 = x##.
  • #1
Battlemage!
294
45

Homework Statement


The problem asks to use a substitution y(x) to turn a series dependent on a real number x into a power series and then find the interval of convergence.

[tex]
\sum_{n=0}^\infty (
\sqrt{x^2+1})^n
\frac{2^n
}{3^n + n^3}[/tex]

Homework Equations


After making a substitution, the book asks you to find pn, then take the limit as n approaches infinity. Basically just the ratio test.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the right numerical answer for the interval of convergence, but I encountered a pretty bad logical inconsistency. I am pretty sure I've made an algebra mistake, but I can't find anything online that has roots, rational inequalities and absolute values all in the same problem, so I have turned to the lovely people at physicsforums.com.

Just to be thorough I'll include every step of the entire problem in case (a) the mistake is in the series manipulation or (b) some other error was made that I missed. I suspect, however, that I have a fundamental algebra misunderstanding.The most obvious substitution here for me was
[tex]y=\sqrt{x^2+1}[/tex]
so putting that in I have:
[tex]
\sum_{n=0}^\infty
y^n
\frac{2^n
}{3^n + n^3}[/tex]

so then pn

[tex]p_n = \left |
\frac {y^{n+1} \text{ }
2^{n+1}
}{3^{n+1} + (n+1)^3} \frac {3^n + n^3}
{y^n \text{ }
2^n} \right |[/tex]

[tex]p_n = \left |
\frac {y^n \text{ }y \text{ }
2^n \text{ }2
}{3^n \text{ }3 + n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n + 1} \frac {3^n + n^3}
{y^n \text{ }
2^n} \right |[/tex]
I always do that ^ so it's easier to see what cancels.

[tex]p_n = \left |
\frac {2y(3^n + n^3)
}{3^n \text{ }3 + n^3 + 3n^2 + 3n + 1} \right |[/tex]

Next I divided everything by 3n.

[tex]p_n = \left |
\frac {2y(1 + \frac{n^3}{3^n})
}{3 + \frac{n^3}{3^n} + \frac{3n^2}{3^n} + \frac{3n}{3^n} + \frac{1}{3^n}} \right |[/tex]So then I have that p = the limit of the above as n goes to infinity, which should be:

[tex]p = \left |
\frac {2}{3}y \right |[/tex]
since an exponential increases way faster than a polynomial.

So, that means the interval of convergence is going to be, if I understand it correctly, [tex] \left |
\frac {2}{3}y \right |<1[/tex]
(not including the endpoints, which must be tested separately.

This is where I think I'm the most lost. As I understand it correctly, normally this would mean:

[tex]
-1< \frac {2}{3}y <1[/tex]

Putting x back in gives

[tex]
-1< \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1[/tex]Moving the 2/3 over:

[tex]
-\frac {3}{2} < \sqrt{x^2+1} < \frac {3}{2} [/tex]Squaring everything:

[tex]
\frac {9}{4} < x^2+1 < \frac {9}{4} [/tex]Then getting the 1 on the other side:
[tex]
\frac {5}{4} < x^2 < \frac {5}{4} [/tex]and lastly taking the root to solve for x:
[tex]
\frac {\sqrt{5}}{2} < x < \frac {\sqrt{5}}{2} [/tex]And what is this madness? How can x be both less than and greater than the same number?Incidentally, according to the textbook answers, the interval of convergence is
[tex] |x|<\frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}[/tex]

so I have the right number. But somewhere along the line I lost logical consistency.Hopefully someone can see where I messed up and enlighten me about the mistake I'm making. Thanks for reading and responding!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Battlemage! said:
Squaring everything:

You don't preserve the solutions to an inequality when you square both sides.

(-2) < (-1) doesn't imply (-2)(-2) < (-1)(-1)

[tex]
-1< \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1[/tex]
could be written as [itex]0 < \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1[/itex] or simply as [itex] \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1 [/itex] since the square root must be non-negative.
 
  • #3
Stephen Tashi said:
You don't preserve the solutions to an inequality when you square both sides.

(-2) < (-1) doesn't imply (-2)(-2) < (-1)(-1)could be written as [itex]0 < \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1[/itex] or simply as [itex] \frac {2}{3} \sqrt{x^2+1} <1 [/itex] since the square root must be non-negative.
Thanks (Weird that I couldn't find anything on this online).

But that still leaves one small conundrum. What is the interval of convergence?
[tex]0 \text{ to } \frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}?[/tex] But as I said the solution for this problem in Boas 3rd ed. according to a solutions book says that the interval of convergence is still an absolute value, namely
[tex]|x| <\frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}[/tex]EDIT- A thought just occurred to me. When solving for x here, I eventually end up with

[tex]x^2 <\frac {5}{4}[/tex]

In middle school we learned that the solution for x2 = 4 was x = 2 or x = -2. Is it something that simple? Would taking the square root give me
[tex]x <\frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}[/tex]
or
[tex]x>-\frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}[/tex]

and could that save me?
 
  • #4
You have the right idea, but aren't expressing it precisely. The square root of a quantity (if that square root exists) is a non-negative number. It isn't "plus or minus" some number.

The solutions to an equation or an inequality are often found by "doing the same thing to both sides of it", but this is not a completely reliable process. You have to think before you act and you can't always find the solutions by "doing the same thing to both sides".

A correct way to solve the equation ##x^2 = 25 ## is think about the possibilities and realize that this equation is has the same solutions as the equation ##|x|^2 = 25##. You can take the square root of both sides of that equation without losing track of the solution x = -5.

If you try to solve ##x^2 = 25## by taking the square root of both sides, you can still save the situation if you realize that ##\sqrt{x^2} = |x| ##.

The misconception that a square root can be "plus or minus" is just a garbled way of describing the above process.
 

1. What is substitution in the context of turning a series into a power series?

Substitution is a mathematical technique used to manipulate and simplify mathematical expressions. In the context of turning a series into a power series, substitution involves replacing the variable in the series with another variable or expression in order to transform it into a power series.

2. Why would we want to use substitution to turn a series into a power series?

Turning a series into a power series can make it easier to work with and solve, as power series have well-defined properties and can be manipulated using familiar techniques. Additionally, power series can provide approximations for more complicated functions.

3. How do we use substitution to turn a series into a power series?

To use substitution, we first need to identify a variable or expression that we can replace in the series. Then, we substitute this variable or expression with a new variable, typically denoted by "x". We then manipulate the series to express it solely in terms of this new variable, resulting in a power series.

4. Are there any limitations to using substitution to turn a series into a power series?

Yes, there are some limitations to this technique. Substitution may not always be possible or may result in a power series that does not converge for all values of x. Additionally, substitution may not always result in a simple or closed form expression for the power series.

5. Can substitution be used for any type of series or only certain types?

Substitution can be used for many types of series, including polynomial, geometric, and trigonometric series. However, it may not always be applicable or useful for certain types of series, such as divergent series.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
267
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
196
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
540
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
714
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
227
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
625
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
494
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
575
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
422
Back
Top