Vector and Axial vector currents in QFT

In summary, the conversation discusses the vector and axialvector currents in a quantum field theory context, where the currents are defined as a product of gamma matrices and Dirac spinors. The vector current is represented by a 1x4 matrix, the axialvector current by a 4x1 matrix, and the product in the middle results in a 4x4 matrix, ultimately giving a single number. The discussion also touches on the use of operators in quantum field theory.
  • #1
RicardoMP
49
2
I'm currently working out quantities that include the vector and axialvector currents ##j^\mu_B(x)=\bar{\psi}(x)\Gamma^\mu_{B,0}\psi(x)## where B stands for V (vector) or A (axialvector). The gamma in the middle is a product of gamma matrices and the psi's are dirac spinors. Therefore on the left I have a 1x4 matrix, on the left a 4x1 matrix and in the middle a 4x4 matrix, thus this current is just a number. Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Usually one write ##\psi(x)## as a column of four numbers. It's a socalled bispinor or Dirac spinor. Then by definition ##\overline{\psi}(x)=\psi^{\dagger}(x) \gamma^0##, and your ##\Gamma^{\mu}##'s are some product of ##\gamma##-matrices. For the vector current it's ##\gamma^{\mu}## for the axial vector current ##\gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5=-\gamma_5 \gamma^{\mu}## (where I use the usual commutation relations of ##\gamma_5## in (1+3)-dimensional Minkowski space; if you do dimensional regularization, sometimes there are extra rules for ##\gamma_5## making it easier to deal with anomalies, but that's more advanced stuff).

So what you multiply in the sense of matrix multiplication is a "row bi-spinor" ##\times## "##4 \times 4## matrix" ##\times## a "column bi-spinor", which gives a number.

Of course, in QFT the ##\psi## are operators, and thus also the ##j^{\mu}##'s become operators (transforming as a four-vector or an axial-four-vector operator, respectively).
 

1. What is the difference between vector and axial vector currents in QFT?

Vector currents are associated with the conservation of a vector quantity, such as electric charge or momentum, while axial vector currents are associated with the conservation of a pseudovector quantity, such as angular momentum. In QFT, vector currents are represented by vector fields, while axial vector currents are represented by pseudovector fields.

2. How are vector and axial vector currents related to symmetries in QFT?

In QFT, symmetries play a crucial role in understanding the behavior of particles and their interactions. Vector currents are associated with continuous symmetries, such as gauge symmetries, while axial vector currents are associated with discrete symmetries, such as parity or time reversal symmetries.

3. What is the role of vector and axial vector currents in the Standard Model of particle physics?

In the Standard Model, vector and axial vector currents play a central role in the description of the fundamental interactions between particles. The electromagnetic and weak interactions are described by vector currents, while the strong interaction is described by axial vector currents.

4. How do vector and axial vector currents contribute to the renormalization of QFT?

One of the challenges in QFT is dealing with infinities that arise in certain calculations. Vector and axial vector currents are important in the renormalization process, which involves adjusting parameters in the theory to account for these infinities and make meaningful predictions.

5. Are there any experimental observations that support the existence of vector and axial vector currents?

Yes, there are many experimental observations that support the existence of vector and axial vector currents. For example, the decay of a neutral pion into two photons is a clear manifestation of the axial vector current, while the decay of a muon into an electron and two neutrinos is a manifestation of the vector current.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
646
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
796
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
859
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top