What is the relationship between quantum states and the size of the universe?

trfinck
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

so I recently watched a vid that talked about Googol and googolplex sized universes, and their implications quantum mechanically. Supposedly, the number of quantum states that the particles that make up our body can make is something like 10^10^70.

The physicist then said that assuming we lived in a Universe with the radius of a googolplex, that we would see a repetition of ourselves somewhere in the Universe.

I understand the concepts of what he's saying, I'd just like some math to understand how one could assume the number of quantum states of particles 1 cubic meters.


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean assume the radius of the universe is 1 googolplex metres, or 1 googolplex quantum particles?
 
Yeah radius of the universe would be 1 googolplex metres.

Here's a link to the video I watched,

http://www.numberphile.com/videos/googolplex.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top