Which Method is Correct for Solving Statics Physics Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozen7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two methods for solving a statics physics problem involving forces. The first method, based on textbook instructions, involves drawing a parallelogram and applying the sine rule to find the force F. The second method assumes the resultant force is parallel to F, leading to a smaller calculated value for F. The correct approach emphasizes minimizing the force in the cable by determining the angle and magnitude of the resultant forces before aligning F with this resultant. Properly breaking down the forces into components is essential for accurate results.
frozen7
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
I have two different ways to solve this question. The first method is using the method taught in textbook: Draw the parallelogram and bend F to a direction which is perpendicular to the resultant force, and use sine rule to find F.
The second method I use is by assuming the direction of the resultant force of 600N and 400N is parallel to F, hence the resultant force,900N is parallel to 400N and F also. Under this condition, F can only be the minimum. The answer I got from the second method is much smaller than the answer from first method.
Can anyone tell me which one is the correct method? Where did I get wrong??
Thanks in advance.:smile:
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    31 KB · Views: 407
Physics news on Phys.org
The question wants you to minimize the force in the cable "F". So in order to do that, you would want to find the angle and magnitude of the resultant of forces given already (like it says to do) then make "F" parallel with this force (at the same angle). So first break apart the given forces into x and y components and find the resultant and its angle.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top