MHB Year 10 Maths Find the length and width that will maximize the area of rectangle

AI Thread Summary
To maximize the area of a rectangle given the constraint \(5W + 2L = 550\), the relationship \(LW = A\) is established. By substituting \(W\) in terms of \(A\) and \(L\), the equation simplifies to \(5A + 2L^2 = 550L\). This quadratic equation indicates that the area \(A\) has a maximum at the vertex, calculated as \(L = \frac{275}{2}\). From this point, determining the corresponding width \(W\) and maximum area \(A\) becomes straightforward. The solution effectively demonstrates how to optimize the area under the given constraints.
liang123993
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 9234

The question is in the image. Working out with every step would be much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • unknown.png
    unknown.png
    6 KB · Views: 114
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a start:

Let $W$ be width, $L$ be length an $A$ be the desired area. Then,

$$5W+2L=550$$

$$LW=A$$

Can you make any progress from there?
 
Greg said:
Here's a start:

Let $W$ be width, $L$ be length an $A$ be the desired area. Then,

$$5W+2L=550$$

$$LW=A$$

Can you make any progress from there?

$$W=\frac AL$$

$$\frac{5A}{L}+2L=550$$

$$5A+2L^2=550L$$

$$A=110L-\frac{2L^2}{5}$$

$A$ has a maximum at the vertex of this inverted parabola, so $L=\frac{275}{2}$. Finding $A$ and $W$ from here should be straightforward.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top