How does the powerball utilize wrist movements to spin and build muscle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter capullosois
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The Powerball is a gyroscope designed for muscle building that utilizes wrist movements to generate resistance and increase rotational speed. Unlike a traditional toy gyroscope, the Powerball's axis ends are positioned in a circular slot, allowing for enhanced grip and friction, which accelerates the interior ball's rotation. Users have reported durability issues with older models, where wear in the circular slot reduces friction and makes it difficult to achieve acceleration. Disassembling the Powerball may not yield insights into its mechanics due to the forces involved, and understanding its function requires knowledge of torque and angular momentum. Overall, the Powerball's design leverages wrist movements to create a unique exercise tool.
capullosois
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A powerball is a gyroscope intended for body building.
What I don't understand is how this powerball is feeded by the wrist movements but my gyroscope doesn't spin faster by moving it in my wrist.
What is different from a toy gyroscope to the powerball because in their adds they say its a gyro.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unlike a gyro, the end points of the axis of a powerball are located in a circular slot. You start by spinning the ball, then rotate the powerball enclosure around. This forces the side of the end of each axis against the sides circular slot, and combined with the resistance to having the axis rotated creates enough "downforce" combined enough friction to create enough grip to increase the rate of rotatation of the interior ball. The ends of the axis are fairly small in diameter, so it doesn't take a lot of angular speed to get the interior ball rotating fairly fast.

My experience with the original ones is they don't last long. Something seems to wear down inside the circular slot, reducing the friction and it gets harder and harder to get the interior ball to acclerate. Eventually you just can't get it to accelerate. The other issue was if you really applied a lot of force in an attempt to get the interior ball to spin really fast, it would cause the power ball to crack or split apart.

Maybe this is fixed in the new ones.
 
Last edited:
Do you think that if I buy one Ill be able to unmount it and see how it works and then mount it again
 
If you "unmount it" (take it apart) you will find inside a ball that is able to spin on an axis. That's all. I doubt you will find out how it works until you understand torque and conservation of angular momentum.
 
capullosois said:
Do you think that if I buy one Ill be able to unmount it and see how it works and then mount it again
Unlikely, there's a lot of force on the edges of the inner slot.

The way to understand how this works, is to imagine taking a regular gyroscope, and rubbing the side of the axis along a flat surface with a lot of friction, in order to spin the gyro.

For the powerball, the side of the axis is forced against the sides of the slots, and the movement by the user just causes the axis sides to be spun by the sides of the slots.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top