hehe sorry, i am kinda poorly worded in nature. to remain at the same onboard frame, is it likely that as the light moves up and down. horizontal motion is attained, now in order for the light to go up and down. the offboard frame would view that light had to cover enough horizontal motion in...
the water carrys the inertia of the motion. if light does the same, if you wave a flashlight horizontal is it likely that if it was slowed to a visible state. it would move as as something similar to a lightsaber. in other words, if you imagined you held a slowed lightsource in your hand and...
sorry to refer to starwars, but if you have a lightsource that emits light slow enough, by this definition you could wave it around like a lightsaber. it would only grow longer. hehe
i think that is simple to understand and straight forward. is that because light of the observer ofboard measures an angle vrs a straight line vertically?
as for the actual length, the theory you put forward simple measures the distances as though light was not forced to compensate for...
ok I am a dullard...
\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}
1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}
these formulas represent the increase of distance. to solve or work it out, do they not exactly also measure the amount of vertical motion lost by the exact nature of measuring the total increase as a result of horizontal...
Ok it seems straight forward thanks. i may have misunderstood a simple concept about light clocks, i do however have a question, again possibly a long one. (note if you care to read brush up on jesseM's first example) it is undeniable the model you should choose, mine resulting from idle...
I read a recent article in the globe and mail about Einstein theory of motion. it suggested a comparison between a observer's onboard and offboard a moving object, in this case a train. They hinted a very similar model to a ball bouncing on a moving train in my other studies. onboard the train...
hehe, well sorry to spin into ideology. I guess the main issue, and the ease of my challenging you, is you chose nuclear powerplants as the ultimate solution. this however may not be the case simply because they may choose a wide spectrum of energy producers, the combined total ranging from wind...
Pengwuino, i concede... nuclear power yields shorterm value... this may sustain long enough to transfer over... however...
With diminishing non renewable, we must seek long term sustainable methods for producing consumable energy. if ever expended our world will face the next 10k years with...
switching to nuclear power is fine, but isn't the entire point to reduce or stop ecological impact and damage?
I nominate you... i believe you diserve to run a nuclear disposale sight... maybe you can head up the neighborhood watch'
oh and ifficency is still a huge issue... would you enjoy...
pengwuino i know i don't have great grammar either, but "can't explain above ' would only be correct from your perspective. since you read it and post below it. as such she would say below. because her discrition wasnt above the title.
ridicule my grammar as much as youd like
i also...
if everything moves away from each other the growth must excell at the fringes,
If you use periods to measure distances, #4 being the fringe of the universe. and #1 reprsenting a relative center.
1..2..3..4
the only way #4 could move at the same rate as the rest, is if only 1 gap existed...
oh it was quick to ponder, but i can see a possible reason for the growth expanding faster at further distances. its simple but here's what id say.
its based on this theory, if everything is expanding away from itself. allow each number to represent a star. its simple barbaric and stupid...
im a simpleton, but as a simple ontopic comparison, what test conditions detirmined the 50% value of hydrogen cars, and is krab's or kingnothing's a more accuratly tested comparison.
no offence to either of you but i would proally support krab, because they proally detirmined the 50% as a...
yes I've gathered that hydrogen burning is efficient once you have the hydrogen. though my question, what additional energy loss should we expect creating hydrogen?