I didn't realize there is such sensitivity around the word 'theory'. My apologies.
The picture shows an emitter sending out a beam of energy, striking the nucleus of an atom with multiple protons (P), and incurring X effect (as you dislike hysteresis) on the protons, causing them to push apart...
Do they? The counter-intuitive nature of that idea stops me cold. Protons are comprised of quarks, yes? Even if quarks have no physical body (does anything, really?) to affect via EM waves, they DO have a frequency, yes? Or at least a vibration. And anything that has a vibration manifests...
Thank you all for the replies!
Gamma decay...perhaps that's not what I'd want to incur. Decay comes from the nucleus, as I understand it. Instead, I'm looking for evidence that an outside signal can be put upon nuclei containing multiple protons, and that the outside signal can incur...
I'm curious if there is any documented effect along these lines, via EM waves. Hypothetically, all objects have a resonant frequency which will cause them to vibrate when matched. As an example, stone has a resonant frequency per type, its molecules also, atoms also, and I personally theorize...
The more I thought about it, the more I realized that indeed a reaction is taking place, though I was thinking double the reaction (i.e. reversing the bullet direction)
Am looking for a way to either absorb kinetic energy entirely without broad transmission, or some other way to negate to 0...
Yes, math is my one true heartbreak. I love science, astronomy, and a host of both artistic and cerebral interests, but math...alas.
Yes, I was using the transient property of math, and applying it to a physics problem. And to me, it seems like they're one and the same. Seems not.
When fired, a slug's acceleration down a barrel produces an equal backward force. I get that.
What I DON'T get, is why there is no rebounding force counter to a slug's impact by the material being struck? The material/molecules simply get impacted and pushed via the force generated. Why is there...
I'm likely going to have a ton of questions in the following weeks about a wide range of particle physics etc.
If (electricity X mercury vapor) = light, then multiplication being transitive, (light X mercury vapor) = electricity.
Can someone inform? I've found only mercury vapor as a metallic...
If one wants a variable worm drive, you could design a micro CVT (transmission) whose output shaft is connected TO / BEFORE the input shaft of the worm drive. That way, you can vary the input revolutions on the worm drive itself, rather than having to make the worm gear somehow be 'variable'...
So I guess you don't give heed to the people with their own doctorates that have given this overview (superforce/expansion rate that supercedes lightspeed) of the initial moment of the universe's creation?
Since it was the superforce that allowed the nascent universe to (it is thought) expand faster than lightspeed, I'm leaning toward that being one of the player applications when they achieve the ability. That can't be all it would allow, though, since even the default player will already be able...
Don't see it moved there yet. Maybe soon...
In grand unification theory, EM, Gravity, Strong/Weak nuclear forces were combined. I have no other name to call this by other than what I've heard it referred to series like "How the Universe Works" and others. Its name isn't really my interest...
What would the result be if a person (or extradimensional entity) were to re-create the superforce?
A little explanation...
I'm a professional game designer/artist for over ten years. Currently I'm creating a 3 faction game, where one faction has total command over the elemental forces of...