Recent content by Degeneration

Right. I'm using the lens to magnify the image so that I get the desired size within a given length, mainly because I don't have too much room on my bench. The beam initially starts out as a gaussian with a 3mm diameter, send it through one lens, have a gap, and then send it through an axicon to...

Thanks, this is helpful. Would a double convex lens produce less aberrations than a plano convex (assuming they're identical in their focusing power). Would the general lensmakers equation be a better choice?

Hello all, I've got an optics problem that I'm having some difficulty with, where I want to send a beam through a converging lens to obtain a certain image size. My incident profile is that of a ring with a certain thickness and use I use this as my object. I want an image of a certain size, so...

You say they do not interact the same because they are not in the same place at the same time, but if they have the same spatial wavefunctions and different spins, won't they still be in the same place at the same time? Do we still need to consider a superposition of the two (instead of...

Oh man, okay. I will update if I get this

Actually, I think I can use |f'(x)/g'(x)| > 1/ \epsilon, but that still doesn't seem too much more helpful

Right, sorry though I forgot to mention this is strictly differentiation. No Riemann sums or integrals are allowed. I understand how that would make it significantly easier though

Homework Statement a in R is finite, f,g are differentiable on R \lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} f(x)=\infty \lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} g(x)=\infty g(x), g'(x) not equal to zero \lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} f'(x)/g'(x)=\infty Show \lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}}...

Where can I buy some dees (aside from acquiring them at a university)?

Anyone know how to do it? I do not know where to find dee electromagnets, nor do I even have the complete design of his system.

Warren, do you know how to make one? I'm trying to make a cyclotron similar to the one made by Lawrence in 1929 but I do not have the design specifics.

I've heard that if two particles are entangled, and one of them is run through a polarizing beam splitter, the beam can be recreated and the entanglement continues. What are the implications of this? Is there actually any use? Thanks

So can this not allow FTL communication? Because if left polarization means on (1) and right means off (0), can't you communicate in binary?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ok so if two particles are entangled and I choose to measure particle A, then the entanglement is finished. But what if I measure both A and B with photons of the exact same energy; is there now a new...

How does causality play into this? I've heard it solves entanglement somehow