L'hopital's case proof, infinite limit

Degeneration
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a in R is finite, f,g are differentiable on R
\lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} f(x)=\infty
\lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} g(x)=\infty

g(x), g'(x) not equal to zero

\lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} f'(x)/g'(x)=\infty

Show \lim_{\substack{x\rightarrow a}} f(x)/g(x)=\infty

Homework Equations


I'm sure you need to use the MVT
f'(c)/g'(c) = (f(x) - f(a))/(g(x) - g(a))

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm starting out trying to use the continuity definition, but it seems to be going nowhere with a infinite limit.

For every number N there is a \delta > 0 s.t. f'(x)/g'(x) > N when 0 < |x - a| < \delta
Additionally, I can't just say lim x->a f'(x)/g'(x) = infinity = L and then use epsilon delta, since I don't know if it works for extended reals. Where can I go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know for every N there is an 'a' such that f'(t)/g'(t)>N for all x>a. Write that as f'(t)>N*g'(t) and integrate both sides from a to x. Then divide by g(x) and think about the limit as x->infinity.
 
Right, sorry though I forgot to mention this is strictly differentiation. No Riemann sums or integrals are allowed. I understand how that would make it significantly easier though
 
Actually, I think I can use |f'(x)/g'(x)| > 1/ \epsilon, but that still doesn't seem too much more helpful
 
Last edited:
Degeneration said:
Right, sorry though I forgot to mention this is strictly differentiation. No Riemann sums or integrals are allowed. I understand how that would make it significantly easier though

Hmm. I guess I'm not really seeing how to do it then. The trouble with your MVT statement is that you know (f(x)-f(a))/(x-a)=f'(c) and (g(x)-g(a))/(x-a)=g'(d), for some values c and d in [a,x], but you don't know that c=d.
 
Oh man, okay. I will update if I get this
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top