Recent content by IAN 25

  1. I

    I How does Hawking radiation contribute to the formation of new stars?

    Right PeterDonis, thanks for that and the link; it answers my query.
  2. I

    I How does Hawking radiation contribute to the formation of new stars?

    Perhaps I am not making myself very clear. My question is about those virtual photons which might travel a long distance / exist for a long time. According to Chalnoth (above) and the Wikipedia entry on 'virtual particles', they start to behave more like their real counterparts. So, I was...
  3. I

    I How does Hawking radiation contribute to the formation of new stars?

    Since discussing Hawking Radiation (two years ago!) I have re-visited the subject of virtual particles in another context. Given what you say, above, and that the range of a photon is in theory, infinite, what happens to a virtual photon mediating an interaction between two electrons (or protons...
  4. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    Of course, yes. Right , thanks.
  5. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    If they move relative to each other, I can see there will be more kinetic energy in the C.M. frame. However, the sum of their momenta will be zero in that frame. So, the expression (E1 + E2 )2 - (p1 + p2)2 will not change as a result will it? Since, the momentum term is zero. Or is the rest...
  6. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    I did read an article featuring this in the UCL Physics department Annual Departmental Review in the year concerned.
  7. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    Yes that is an interesting example. In you original expression, it is clearly the term 2(E1 E2 - p1. p2 which provides the range of kinetic energies of the pions observed either side of the peak in the laboratory frame.
  8. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    Got it! I can follow the algebra but the two worded sentences of physics (mfb) add clarity. Thank you both.
  9. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    I still don't see why this gives a range of rest mass energies. That's the point I am trying to understand - the continuous range?
  10. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    To me invariant mass means invariant, whether its a sum for several particles or not; the masses have discrete values and E2 -(pc)2 = m2c4 for each particle (or for a sum of particles) which as I understand it, is a scalar invariant - which has the same value in all inertial frames, does it...
  11. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    Thank you. Okay, I understand what the invariant mass of the system is - but if it is the sum of the invariant masses of the (two?) pions that is plotted, why is there a continuous range?
  12. I

    I Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

    The interaction p + π- → n + π- + π + may proceed by the creation of an intermediate 'particle' or resonance called a rho. This can be detected as a peak in the plot of invariant rest mass energy of the emergent pions versus frequency of pions observed. My question is quite simply, invariant...
  13. I

    I The Relation Between Wavefunctions in Dirac Equation

    Thanks for taking the trouble to reply to me. I can understand some of that but I will read further as you suggest. Thank you.
  14. I

    I The Relation Between Wavefunctions in Dirac Equation

    Okay, thank you very much for that.
  15. I

    I The Relation Between Wavefunctions in Dirac Equation

    Thank you Vanhees, I am familiar with the expressions above; the first being the Fourier expansion in terms of the annihilation and creation operators for particles and antiparticles. The second, normalization expressions giving the roots of the K.G Equation. However, your answer is purely...
Back
Top