Recent content by palaphys

  1. palaphys

    Angular Momentum- Conserved or not?

    ok that makes sense. but I have a question. IF there was no external torque (hypothetical) then is it valid to conserve momentum as I have said?
  2. palaphys

    Angular Momentum- Conserved or not?

    I have another question: If angular momentum is conserved, then it would be conserved in all directions. But in the horizontal direction, the initial angular momentum is zero, and the final angular momentum is non zero (## L_{aboutcm}## of the vertical disc). Why is this? Am I right in the first...
  3. palaphys

    Angular Momentum- Conserved or not?

    Consider the diagram shown above. I came up with two ideas to solve this: i) I do not see any external torques about the vertical axis in this problem. so, angular momentum is conserved about this axis. (is it?) ii)the standard way, that is, writing newton's second law for rotation, and applying...
  4. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    so are you implying, that the value of F I got using force balance, IS a valid value for some a force to get the block moving? but it's not the maximum value. Did I get you right?
  5. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    but when velocity is maximum, there is a momentary equilibrium, isn't it? this means forces at that point of time will be balanced. is it not?
  6. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    When the acceleration is maximum, the velocity will be zero, and vice verca. I'm aware of this. But how is it going to help in this case?
  7. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    Well, force balance leads to the answer: ##F= μg(m_1 +m_2)##using work done (energy balance equation) leads to ##F= μg(m_2 + 2m_1)/2##, which is given as the right answer. So yes, you are right. Force balance is giving a solution which is more than the required force.
  8. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    When F is large enough to move m1, m1 will start with some acceleration, such that F>kx+friction where x is the elongation in the spring. At one instant, when the mass has maximum velocity, F=kx+ friction , after which the mass m1 will begin to decelerate, i.e its velocity will decrease. This...
  9. palaphys

    Irodov- 1.123- Simple conceptual question with two masses connected by a spring

    The diagram above describes the situation. Say the spring constant is k. The main goal will be to apply the condition that when the spring force exactly balances the limiting friction, m2 will begin to slide. i.e ##kx=μm_2g## I came up with two approaches for this one. i) Assume that m1 is in...
  10. palaphys

    Vertical Circular motion- A confusing question

    EDIT- yes, I meant to say that it is ##\arccos (\frac 23) ## with the vertical
  11. palaphys

    Vertical Circular motion- A confusing question

    Yes, this is my understanding Here is my working: yes, I meant to say that it is ##\arccos (\frac 23) ## with the horizontal. thanks for the help
  12. palaphys

    Vertical Circular motion- A confusing question

    okay, so you are saying that the string can only reach the top slack, with the given speed in the question, that too in a hypothetical case. Whereas a rigid massless rod given the same speed would reach the top always, as tension would prevent it from collapsing at the bottom. (please correct me...
  13. palaphys

    Vertical Circular motion- A confusing question

    I will try to use this fact to proceed with the problem
  14. palaphys

    Vertical Circular motion- A confusing question

    not understanding what you mean by compression. is it stress/ tension?
Back
Top