Recent content by Radarithm
-
Practice Questions (Lagrangians + Hamiltonians)
Looks good. Thanks.- Radarithm
- Post #3
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
Practice Questions (Lagrangians + Hamiltonians)
I need to brush up on L and H. Does anyone know of any sources of practice for these two? Any problem sets? Thanks.- Radarithm
- Thread
- Lagrangians
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
What Are the Best Resources for Self-Studying Quantum Physics as an Engineer?
You can jump into Zettili straight away but I do not recommend it.- Radarithm
- Post #4
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
What Are the Best Resources for Self-Studying Quantum Physics as an Engineer?
Since you've only done Physics 1 & 2, you should work on strengthening your Classical Mechanics before jumping into Quantum. Perhaps, before getting Zettili for QM (here: http://tinyurl.com/zettiliqm you could use Taylor's Classical Mechanics text (sophomore-junior level), found here...- Radarithm
- Post #3
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
What's Coming in Physics Forums 4.0?
Nice one, Greg. Can't wait for 4.0! Now, back to lurking...- Radarithm
- Post #90
- Forum: Feedback and Announcements
-
Graduate Does the action have any physical significance?
So the action is just a mathematical tool; I guess that's why I didn't expect it to have any physical meaning (like the Lagrangian).- Radarithm
- Post #4
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
Graduate Does the action have any physical significance?
After studying the methods of Lagrange and Hamilton for a bit I still find myself uneasy about the action. I don't even know how to define it other than the integral of the Lagrangian with respect to time: $$I=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}\mathrm{d}t\, L(q,\dot{q},t)$$ Does the action have any...- Radarithm
- Thread
- Physical Significance
- Replies: 16
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
Classical An Introduction to Mechanics by Daniel Kleppner and Robert J. Kolenkow
Calculus 1 is all you need for K&K. Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics are (unfortunately) not covered in K&K. A similar book in classical mechanics (which you should get after K&K or use it alongside it), Taylor, Classical Mechanics does include Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics along with...- Radarithm
- Post #55
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
Can I Handle Landau and Lifschitz Books on Theoretical Physics?
You should be able to handle them; it seems you already have the necessary prereqs.- Radarithm
- Post #2
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
Self-Study Physics: Get Resources & Books for Success
Once you finish (at least) the mechanics segment of Young and Freedman, you should go for this book: Kleppner and Kolenkow - An Introduction to Mechanics. edit: Make sure you have a good grasp on calculus I material before getting this book, as it is used when solving problems and explaining...- Radarithm
- Post #8
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
Electric field above a circular loop
Yes, that was the angle I meant. That makes sense. I guess I'll have to be careful about my notation; I should have also included the step where the line integral transforms into an integral for ##d\theta##. Thanks for the help!- Radarithm
- Post #6
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Electric field above a circular loop
The radial component of the electric field cancels out at every point due to the symmetry of the circle and the fact that the electric field arises from a line charge. This leaves us with the z component of the electric field, which can be calculated by carrying out the following integral (is it...- Radarithm
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Electric field above a circular loop
Homework Statement Find the electric field a distance z above the center of a circular loop of radius r that carries a uniform line charge λ. Homework Equations $$E=E_r\hat{r}+E_z\hat{z}$$ $$E_r=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_0^r\frac{1}{\mathcal{R}^2}\sin{\theta}\,dr$$...- Radarithm
- Thread
- Circular Circular loop Electric Electric field Field Loop
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
Graduate A question about conservation of momentum (Lagrangian)
Apparently it seems like a convention. Correct me if I'm wrong but Landau shows that ##L=L'## under Galilean transformations. Did you want me to explain how? Unless that's the case, then I guess him going to the action is probably a convention, a way to prove this invariance. I think if you... -
Graduate A question about conservation of momentum (Lagrangian)
I think its just another way of proving Galilean invariance (I'm not very familiar with the Galilean invariance of the Lagrangian). Do you mind showing me how they go about proving this (the part where they go to the action)? I might be able to use that information and relate it to the value of...