Recent content by randomuser3210

So if I understand correctly, preparation procedure is the main limit. But, maybe it would be possible to create this in the future with relevant tech. (to translate any relevant thought experiment with it) into an actual one right (assuming a much smarter civilisation and so on) ? :)

I assumed they could be prepared as the theory (with my naive knowledge) permits it. I could be wrong though?

I should have stated 'Generic Version of Bell Equation' or something to that effect. But even if we have two different particles after collapse so we can distinguish them as you suggest, the rest of the original wave function, random coin toss distribution of the wave function (some part with...

Nugatory Thank you. I understand. Of course the limitation of classical language. I would take care.And I am curious about the 'only in thought experiment' as I asked. WhI mean is it due to limitation of our experimental setup or engineering capabilities as of today or something else?

Thank you. And this is true assuming we always decide to give which particle to whom randomly (say by a coin toss) ? and I didn't get the thought experiment part. I mean is it due to limitation of our experimental setup or engineering capabilities as of today or something else?

Given the Bell State in Z basis ##\psi = (a\uparrow \downarrow - b\downarrow \uparrow )## where ##a^2+b^2=1##. Now Alice has one particle and sends the other to Bob. Suppose Alice decides to measure her particle in Z direction. Thus entanglement collapses. Query: 1. How do we know which...

So if I understand correctly, no matter who measures in what direction first (in any of the 4 General Bell States, not just this one), the end result of the measurement of Bob (and the probabilities of ##\downarrow_B or \uparrow_B## only depends on the direction Bob measures in.

Thank you. I don't have background in QM/Physics. So I am lost at this compact reply and notation. If possible at all, could you provide more explicit probabilities (in notations in OP). Or point to a resource that goes step by step..

Consider two entangled spin half particles given by the generic form of Bell Equation in Z-axis: ##\psi = (a\uparrow \uparrow + b\downarrow \downarrow)## where ##a^2+b^2=1## In a (2D) planer rotated (by an angle ##\theta##) direction the new equation can be given by: ##|\psi \rangle =...

Consider two entangled spin half particles given by the generic form of Bell Equation in Z-axis: ##\psi = (a\uparrow \uparrow + b\downarrow \downarrow)## where ##a^2+b^2=1## In a (2D) planer rotated (by an angle ##\theta##) direction the new equation can be given by: ##|\psi \rangle =...