Recent content by STEM2012

@micromass. Thanks for the problem course link. I'll use it as a supplement to the Munkres text which I just ordered. @Petek. Thanks for the idea. Like you said, it seems ideal as a supplement to another text since it is only an "outline."

You're right about a nonexistent official solutions manual. I was looking at some solutions posted by other users, which I guess is the reason they were incomplete. With that said, do you know of some other text that matches what I'm looking for AND has a solutions manual (either for free or...

Thanks micromass. Although its a bit pricy, my school is paying for it so I think I'll purchase it. By the way, could you give me a good source for downloading the solutions manual. I've done some looking into that already, but everything I've found is incomplete and requires logging in...

I know there are some threads out there already, but none really help me (see my description below). I am a high school student. My highest level of math education is Calculus I. I am currently taking Calculus II (although I already know the integration portion of this course). I have no...

Ok. I understand how you integrated from dF/dr=r^k to find a solution, but how the heck did you get that differential to begin with? Also, I don't understand where did the k=-2 come from? Keep in mind, I'm only in high school and my highest level of math education is AP calc AB (which is calc...

Okay, now that the relationship between E and F is established, I can say that dE/dx=-kQ1Q2/d^2. Bu from here, how do I get to the modified form, where r is the denominator.

New to PF. How is the "original" form of coulomb's law F=kQ1Q2/D^2 derived into the modified chemistry form used to predict the energy released when bonds form (or the inverse), E=kQ1Q2/r? Please describe your mathematical steps. Feel free to just post links explaining this. I've searched...