This appears to be the only difference between a sigma-algebra and a Dynkin system:
Sigma-algebra is closed under countable union
Dynkin system is closed under countable union of disjoint sets
This seems to result in the D-system not being a pi-system (while the sigma-alg is). Why...
OK fair enough, but that still doesn't explain why the rationals aren't in the algebra to begin with. I apologize for being slow to understand your argument. Thanks
Thanks - but to me that just suggests the rationals should in fact be in the algebra, rather than proving a contradiction. Why are the rationals not in the algebra to begin with?
Hello, first I’d like to clarify that the only difference between an algebra and a sigma-algebra, is that we have
A,B \in \mathcal{A} \Rightarrow A \cup B \in \mathcal{A} \text{ (1) for } \mathcal{A} \text{ algebra}A_1, A_2, A_3, \ldots\in\mathcal{A} \Rightarrow \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}A_i...
Hello, I was just wondering if is it true that the limit of a monotonic transformation of a function is the same as the monotonic transformation of its limit? That is, does
\lim_{n \rightarrow a} f(g(x)) = f(\lim_{n \rightarrow a} g(x))
for monotonic f, some a, and such that if the limit...
Hello, in relation to Markov chains, could you please clarify the following equations:
In particular, could you please expand on why the first line is equal. Surely from , along with the first equation, this implies that:
I just don't see why they are all equal. Please could you...