Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around sharing and enjoying "lame" jokes, with participants contributing various puns and one-liners. Jokes include classic setups like "A duck walks into a pharmacy..." and "Why did the chicken cross the road?" along with playful wordplay, such as "What do you call a boomerang that doesn't work? A stick." The humor is characterized by its groan-inducing quality, with many jokes eliciting laughter despite their simplicity. Participants also engage in light banter about the nature of humor, with some jokes being deemed too funny to qualify as "lame." The thread highlights a shared enjoyment of corny humor and the camaraderie that comes from exchanging jokes, creating a lighthearted atmosphere.
  • #23,351
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

IMG_1555.webp


Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #23,352
jtbell said:
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

View attachment 366960

Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!
And no one knew toilet paper was going to run until 2020...
 
  • #23,353
jtbell said:
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

View attachment 366960

Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!

I know (or at least strongly suspect) that Y2K problems isn't the real issue here. Nevertheless, I remember being issued with a bunch of paper, the thickness of several telephones books (anyone know what a telephone book is anymore?), with C code, in small font on both pages, being asked if I would please use my free time to scan through it and see if there should be any problems.

I mean why on paper? And my free time?!

I'm glad I'm retired.
 
  • #23,354
sbrothy said:
I know (or at least strongly suspect) that Y2K problems isn't the real issue here. Nevertheless, I remember being issued with a bunch of paper, the thickness of several telephones books (anyone know what a telephone book is anymore?), with C code, in small font on both pages, being asked if I would please use my free time to scan through it and see if there should be any problems.

I mean why on paper? And my free time?!

I'm glad I'm retired.
You scanned toilet paper?
 
  • #23,355
WWGD said:
You scanned toilet paper?
It might as well have been.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes jack action and collinsmark
  • #23,356
sbrothy said:
It might as well have been.
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, DaveC426913, jack action and 1 other person
  • #23,357
The moon landing conspiracies are back again thanks to Kim Kardashian.

Pure lunacy!
 
  • #23,358
Ivan Seeking said:
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
The Euro was introduced in 1998 here. That meant a lot of examination of very, very old mainframe code in banking software, esp. as notations were swapped from the price of one dollar to the price of one euro. Checking the Y2K problem was a byproduct. I had never imagined seeing real-life assembler code before, but I did. At least it gave me the rare opportunity to watch Sylvester fireworks at the 21st level over the town.
 
  • #23,359
fresh_42 said:
The Euro was introduced in 1998 here. That meant a lot of examination of very, very old mainframe code in banking software, esp. as notations were swapped from the price of one dollar to the price of one euro. Checking the Y2K problem was a byproduct. I had never imagined seeing real-life assembler code before, but I did. At least it gave me the rare opportunity to watch Sylvester fireworks at the 21st level over the town.
Only announced much later, we did have a Y2K related national defense system fail

This is from Google AI, but I remember when this information was released, which is how I knew to look it up.

One significant US defensive system experienced a failure shortly after midnight UTC on January 1, 2000 (which was still Dec 31st, 1999, in the US time zones). A ground-based computer failure temporarily blinded several US spy satellites.

The system, an intelligence processing station at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, went offline for two to three hours. The problem wasn't with the satellites themselves, which remained under control, but with the ground station's ability to process the incoming information due to a Y2K-related error in a software patch.
 
  • Informative
Likes jack action
  • #23,360
Ivan Seeking said:
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
How about Y2038?
 
  • #23,361
Wonder why we don't have unisex stores where you can walk around in your underwear to try clothes on, so you don't have to repeatedly dress and undress when buying clothes?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark, symbolipoint and fresh_42
  • #23,362
WWGD said:
Wonder why we don't have unisex stores where you can walk around in your underwear to try clothes on, so you don't have to repeatedly dress and undress when buying clothes?
Because the men would never leave?
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, sbrothy and fresh_42
  • #23,363
WWGD said:
How about Y2038?
We are supposed to keep that a secret, so Colossus fails after taking over the world.
 
  • #23,364
Ivan Seeking said:
Because the men would never leave?
I barely want to go buy clothes at all. I don't see myself wanting to stay in longer than necessary.
 
  • #23,365
WWGD said:
I barely want to go buy clothes at all. I don't see myself wanting to stay in longer than necessary.
With a bunch of women walking around in their underwear? The young guys would sit and never stand up!
 
  • #23,366
Ivan Seeking said:
With a bunch of women walking around in their underwear? The young guys would never even stand u Maybe I misused the term 'Unisex'. I meant one exclusively for women and another exclusively for men.
 
  • #23,367
I like the other option better.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and Borg
  • #23,368
Ivan Seeking said:
I like the other option better.
Think about it again! A nude beach isn't half as exciting as it sounds.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and jrmichler
  • #23,369
WWGD said:
Maybe I misused the term 'Unisex'. I meant one exclusively for women and another exclusively for men.
WWGD has a point.

Unisex actually means 'single sex'.

We've always misused it to mean sex-agnostic or omni-sex.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint, WWGD and BillTre
  • #23,370
DaveC426913 said:
WWGD has a point.

Unisex actually means 'single sex'.

We've always misused it to mean sex-agnostic or omni-sex.
unisex
adjective
intended for use by both males and females:
unisex clothes
a unisex hairdresser's

wiki
The term 'unisex' was coined in the 1960s and was used fairly informally. The combining prefix uni- is from Latin unus, meaning one or single. However, 'unisex' seems to have been influenced by words such as united and universal, in which uni- takes the related sense shared. Unisex then means shared by sexes.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unisex#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a>
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and BillTre
  • #23,371
So to be clear: the prefix "uni" means shared and not shared.
 
  • #23,372
Somehow I knew what @WWGD meant by unisex, even if it conflicts with the word's definition.
 
  • #23,373
I was too young to see the film Troy when it came out, so I built myself a giant wooden adult.

(Adapted from a joke by Milton Jones.)
 
  • #23,374
Ivan Seeking said:
The moon landing conspiracies are back again thanks to Kim Kardashian.

Pure lunacy!
Ask her to explain the number mirrors up there then:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon

I mean you can't just randomly dump them. They have to be directed back at earth for the reflection to work.
 
  • #23,375
sbrothy said:
Ask her to explain the number mirrors up there then:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon

I mean you can't just randomly dump them. They have to be directed back at earth for the reflection to work.
I will the next time I see her.

Her defense for this claim is to check tik tok.
 
  • #23,376
Age is an issue of mind over matter: If you don't mind, it doesn't matter.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sbrothy and fresh_42
  • #23,377
1762039806333.webp
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy and jack action
  • #23,378
Ivan Seeking said:
I will the next time I see her.

Her defense for this claim is to check tik tok.
OK. Then it's a battle we can't win! :smile:

Against tik tok anyone is defenseless.
 
  • #23,379
What DaveC426913 says is much more logical. But do we have a prefix with combining meaning for "Either or all classifications..." ?
 
  • #23,380
symbolipoint said:
What DaveC426913 says is much more logical. But do we have a prefix with combining meaning for "Either or all classifications..." ?
omni-
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes fresh_42, symbolipoint and BillTre
  • #23,381
DaveC426913 said:
omni-
The next time we come up to a door with one of those symbols on it or it says "unisex", we should ask a clerk, "Which one?"
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #23,382
symbolipoint said:
The next time we come up to a door with one of those symbols on it or it says "unisex", we should ask a clerk, "Which one?"
In Halloween? The witch one.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
  • #23,383
symbolipoint said:
The next time we come up to a door with one of those symbols on it or it says "unisex", we should ask a clerk, "Which one?"
Ask if it's binary or analog.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
  • #23,384
Ivan Seeking said:
Ask if it's binary or analog.
Is that the new terminology?

"I'm not binary; I'm analog."
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #23,385
Ivan Seeking said:
Ask if it's binary or analog.
The Italians have to distinguish between binario and binaria, depending on the gender of the person. :cool:
 
  • #23,386
DaveC426913 said:
Is that the new terminology?

"I'm not binary; I'm analog."
Once you've been married long enough, they are called resistors.
 
  • #23,387
1762062346596.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sbrothy, berkeman, fresh_42 and 2 others
  • #23,388
1762062369830.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes nsaspook, fresh_42, Ivan Seeking and 5 others
  • #23,389
1762095966444.webp
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, davenn and BillTre
  • #23,391
Poster at a suspicious Computer Repair place. "I'd rather be phishing."
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and DaveC426913
  • #23,392
Screenshot 2025-11-02 at 8.13.17 AM.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes collinsmark, jtbell, sbrothy and 6 others
  • #23,393
Ivan Seeking said:
Once you've been married long enough, they are called resistors.
I was close to report that one! o0)
 
  • #23,394
1762133127757.webp
 
  • Like
Likes jack action, jtbell, BillTre and 2 others
  • #23,395
1762133760948.webp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Ivan Seeking, davenn, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #23,396
fresh_42 said:
The Italians have to distinguish between binario and binaria, depending on the gender of the person. :cool:
As long as the espresso machine is working, it will be ok.
 
  • #23,397
davenn said:
I remember that one from our daily calendar. 1987 sounds about right! We got a daily Gary Larson calendar every year until he stopped making them,.
 
  • #23,398
A belated Halloween joke:

What's the Halloween capital of the U. S.?

Eerie, Pennsylvania.
 
  • Like
Likes Ivan Seeking and BillTre
  • #23,399
jtbell said:
A belated Halloween joke:

What's the Halloween capital of the U. S.?

Eerie, Pennsylvania.
And I thought Salem (Massachusetts).
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell and BillTre
  • #23,400
I was inspired to post that joke by an article I read in my Apple News feed just now, from People magazine. It was about a 1980s event (not Halloween related!) in Cleveland, Ohio. It consistently referred to "Lake Eerie." I thought, "someone must have had too much to drink at a Halloween party."
 

Similar threads

Replies
459
Views
33K
Replies
57
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
178
9
Replies
402
Views
39K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
185
Views
10K