Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around sharing and enjoying "lame" jokes, with participants contributing various puns and one-liners. Jokes include classic setups like "A duck walks into a pharmacy..." and "Why did the chicken cross the road?" along with playful wordplay, such as "What do you call a boomerang that doesn't work? A stick." The humor is characterized by its groan-inducing quality, with many jokes eliciting laughter despite their simplicity. Participants also engage in light banter about the nature of humor, with some jokes being deemed too funny to qualify as "lame." The thread highlights a shared enjoyment of corny humor and the camaraderie that comes from exchanging jokes, creating a lighthearted atmosphere.
  • #23,341
jack action said:
Shopping centers are so boring, because if you've seen one, you've seen them all.
you've seen the mall.
Mirror won't tell me. I'm still trying to figure out who's the fairest of the mall.
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes DaveC426913 and nuuskur
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #23,342
fresh_42 said:
White to move. Mate in a week.

View attachment 366859
that's really good exercise for both the body and the mind :cool:
 
  • #23,343
nsaspook said:

Embarrassingly, I'd never heard of Rust until your joke there. I had a nostalgia attack reading about it and seeing a reference to Dr. Dobb's Journal!

Rust does not use garbage collection. Memory and other resources are instead managed through the "resource acquisition is initialization" convention, with optional reference counting. Rust provides deterministic management of resources, with very low overhead. Values are allocated on the stack by default, and all dynamic allocations must be explicit.

Rust (Wikipedia)

Gotta love that expression.
 
  • #23,344
sbrothy said:
Embarrassingly, I'd never heard of Rust until your joke there. I had a nostalgia attack reading about it and seeing a reference to Dr. Dobb's Journal!



Rust (Wikipedia)

Gotta love that expression.
No diamonds? Or at least a Green Manalishi?
 
  • #23,345
WWGD said:
No diamonds? Or at least a Green Manalishi?
I'm afraid that joke didn't land here. Is it an age-thing?
 
  • #23,346
sbrothy said:
I'm afraid that joke didn't land here. Is it an age-thing?
Judas Priest are timeless. I've heard them in radios recently. Maybe you're more into pop than metal/Hard Rock. Or you love some baby but not a Manalishi.
 
  • #23,347
I enjoy everything except rap and hip-hop. Especially hardcore metal and progressive (psy)trance. Also flamenco and opera. We have entire thread dedicated to the subject here.

I like beer. At least 7% alc. vol. Anything thinner tastes like water.

 
  • #23,348
sbrothy said:
I enjoy everything except rap and hip-hop. Especially hardcore metal and progressive (psy)trance. Also flamenco and opera. We have entire thread dedicated to the subject here.

I like beer. At least 7% alc. vol. Anything thinner tastes like water.


I used to intern , i.e., little more than being a Caffeine-Supply Engineer at this place that had a (Digital) radio on all the time. They'd switch stations occassionally. So I've taken in a vast swath of music over that time.
 
  • #23,349
Hah! But you knew! You're just yanking my chain! :woot:
 
  • #23,350
WWGD said:
Or at least a Green Manalishi?

I still like the Peter Green (RIP :frown:) Fleetwood Mac original
 
  • #23,351
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

IMG_1555.webp


Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #23,352
jtbell said:
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

View attachment 366960

Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!
And no one knew toilet paper was going to run until 2020...
 
  • #23,353
jtbell said:
Who's got nostalgia for Y2K?

View attachment 366960

Of course, nobody on the Internet knew he was a dog until the book outed him!

I know (or at least strongly suspect) that Y2K problems isn't the real issue here. Nevertheless, I remember being issued with a bunch of paper, the thickness of several telephones books (anyone know what a telephone book is anymore?), with C code, in small font on both pages, being asked if I would please use my free time to scan through it and see if there should be any problems.

I mean why on paper? And my free time?!

I'm glad I'm retired.
 
  • #23,354
sbrothy said:
I know (or at least strongly suspect) that Y2K problems isn't the real issue here. Nevertheless, I remember being issued with a bunch of paper, the thickness of several telephones books (anyone know what a telephone book is anymore?), with C code, in small font on both pages, being asked if I would please use my free time to scan through it and see if there should be any problems.

I mean why on paper? And my free time?!

I'm glad I'm retired.
You scanned toilet paper?
 
  • #23,355
WWGD said:
You scanned toilet paper?
It might as well have been.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes jack action and collinsmark
  • #23,356
sbrothy said:
It might as well have been.
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, DaveC426913, jack action and 1 other person
  • #23,357
The moon landing conspiracies are back again thanks to Kim Kardashian.

Pure lunacy!
 
  • #23,358
Ivan Seeking said:
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
The Euro was introduced in 1998 here. That meant a lot of examination of very, very old mainframe code in banking software, esp. as notations were swapped from the price of one dollar to the price of one euro. Checking the Y2K problem was a byproduct. I had never imagined seeing real-life assembler code before, but I did. At least it gave me the rare opportunity to watch Sylvester fireworks at the 21st level over the town.
 
  • #23,359
fresh_42 said:
The Euro was introduced in 1998 here. That meant a lot of examination of very, very old mainframe code in banking software, esp. as notations were swapped from the price of one dollar to the price of one euro. Checking the Y2K problem was a byproduct. I had never imagined seeing real-life assembler code before, but I did. At least it gave me the rare opportunity to watch Sylvester fireworks at the 21st level over the town.
Only announced much later, we did have a Y2K related national defense system fail

This is from Google AI, but I remember when this information was released, which is how I knew to look it up.

One significant US defensive system experienced a failure shortly after midnight UTC on January 1, 2000 (which was still Dec 31st, 1999, in the US time zones). A ground-based computer failure temporarily blinded several US spy satellites.

The system, an intelligence processing station at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, went offline for two to three hours. The problem wasn't with the satellites themselves, which remained under control, but with the ground station's ability to process the incoming information due to a Y2K-related error in a software patch.
 
  • Informative
Likes jack action
  • #23,360
Ivan Seeking said:
I just used the same solution for Y2K, that we used for Y1K.
How about Y2038?
 
  • #23,361
Wonder why we don't have unisex stores where you can walk around in your underwear to try clothes on, so you don't have to repeatedly dress and undress when buying clothes?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark, symbolipoint and fresh_42
  • #23,362
WWGD said:
Wonder why we don't have unisex stores where you can walk around in your underwear to try clothes on, so you don't have to repeatedly dress and undress when buying clothes?
Because the men would never leave?
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, sbrothy and fresh_42
  • #23,363
WWGD said:
How about Y2038?
We are supposed to keep that a secret, so Colossus fails after taking over the world.
 
  • #23,364
Ivan Seeking said:
Because the men would never leave?
I barely want to go buy clothes at all. I don't see myself wanting to stay in longer than necessary.
 
  • #23,365
WWGD said:
I barely want to go buy clothes at all. I don't see myself wanting to stay in longer than necessary.
With a bunch of women walking around in their underwear? The young guys would sit and never stand up!
 
  • #23,366
Ivan Seeking said:
With a bunch of women walking around in their underwear? The young guys would never even stand u Maybe I misused the term 'Unisex'. I meant one exclusively for women and another exclusively for men.
 
  • #23,367
I like the other option better.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and Borg
  • #23,368
Ivan Seeking said:
I like the other option better.
Think about it again! A nude beach isn't half as exciting as it sounds.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and jrmichler
  • #23,369
WWGD said:
Maybe I misused the term 'Unisex'. I meant one exclusively for women and another exclusively for men.
WWGD has a point.

Unisex actually means 'single sex'.

We've always misused it to mean sex-agnostic or omni-sex.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint, WWGD and BillTre
  • #23,370
DaveC426913 said:
WWGD has a point.

Unisex actually means 'single sex'.

We've always misused it to mean sex-agnostic or omni-sex.
unisex
adjective
intended for use by both males and females:
unisex clothes
a unisex hairdresser's

wiki
The term 'unisex' was coined in the 1960s and was used fairly informally. The combining prefix uni- is from Latin unus, meaning one or single. However, 'unisex' seems to have been influenced by words such as united and universal, in which uni- takes the related sense shared. Unisex then means shared by sexes.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unisex#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a>
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 459 ·
16
Replies
459
Views
33K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
231
  • · Replies 402 ·
14
Replies
402
Views
39K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 185 ·
7
Replies
185
Views
10K