About the mass-energy relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I see how the premises

<br /> <br /> p = \gamma m v<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> F = \frac {dp}{dt}<br /> <br />

and

<br /> <br /> <br /> W= \int F dx<br /> <br />

lead to

<br /> <br /> dW = mc^2 d \gamma<br /> <br />

and therefore

<br /> <br /> W = \gamma mc^2 + k<br /> <br />

where m is the rest mass and k is a constant of integration. But why do we conclude that k=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That constant won't equal 0. (The work done equals the KE, not the total energy.) Assume you start from rest and integrate to speed v.
 
I get

<br /> <br /> W = \gamma mc^2 - mc ^2 = ( \gamma - 1 ) mc^2 <br /> <br /> <br />

so

<br /> <br /> k = -mc^2 \neq 0<br /> <br />

Since W(v=0) = 0 this is indeed the kinetic energy and not the total energy. Thanks, Doc Al.
 
Follow-up: Am I to conclude that the constant of integration here represents the (negative) "rest energy" of the object, or is there a better way to arrive at that relationship?
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top