Greatest common divisor of fractions and decimals

AI Thread Summary
The greatest common divisor (GCD) is traditionally defined only for integers, making it inapplicable to decimals and fractions without further definitions. If fractions or irrational numbers are considered, any non-zero number can serve as a common divisor or multiple, eliminating the concepts of "least" or "greatest." A proposed solution involves defining a divisor for positive rational numbers, where x divides y if y/x is an integer. This allows for the potential calculation of GCD and least common multiple (LCM) under this new framework. Therefore, while traditional GCD calculations do not extend to decimals and fractions, alternative definitions can facilitate their computation.
topito2
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to calculate the greatest common divisor of decimals and fractions? As far as I know, the greatest common divisor is a number you can calculate for integers, but I wonder if it's possible to calculate it for decimals and fractions.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No. "Least common multiple" and "greatest common divisor" are only defined for integers. If you allow fractions or irrational numbers, then any number, other than 0, can be a "common multiple" or "common divisor" so there are no "least" or "greatest".
 
You will have to define divisor and multiple for this to work. One possibility: for positive rational numbers x,y, say x divides y if y/x is an integer. With this definition, gcd and lcm can be defined.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top